Total Perspective Vortex
What really happened to Trillian? Theories abound, but you can see what she's really been up to on this blog. If you're looking for white mice, depressed robots, or the occasional Pan Galactic Gargleblaster you might be better served here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/guide/.

Otherwise, hello, and welcome.
Mail Trillian here<




Trillian McMillian
Trillian McMillian
Create Your Badge






Instagram






Women, The Internet and You: Tips for Men Who Use Online Dating Sites
Part I, Your Profile and Email

Part II, Selecting a Potential Date

Part III, Your First Date!

Part IV, After the First Date. Now What?


"50 First Dates"






Don't just sit there angry and ranting, do something constructive.
In the words of Patti Smith (all hail Sister Patti): People have the power.
Contact your elected officials.

Don't be passive = get involved = make a difference.
Find Federal Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Find State Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Contact The Media
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State





Words are cool.
The English language is complex, stupid, illogical, confounding, brilliant, beautiful, and fascinating.
Every now and then a word presents itself that typifies all the maddeningly gorgeousness of language. They're the words that give you pause for thought. "Who came up with that word? That's an interesting string of letters." Their beauty doesn't lie in their definition (although that can play a role). It's also not in their onomatopoeia, though that, too, can play a role. Their beauty is in the way their letters combine - the visual poetry of words - and/or the way they sound when spoken. We talk a lot about music we like to hear and art we like to see, so let's all hail the unsung heroes of communication, poetry and life: Words.
Here are some I like. (Not because of their definition.)

Quasar
Hyperbole
Amenable
Taciturn
Ennui
Prophetic
Tawdry
Hubris
Ethereal
Syzygy
Umbrageous
Twerp
Sluice
Omnipotent
Sanctuary
Malevolent
Maelstrom
Luddite
Subterfuge
Akimbo
Hoosegow
Dodecahedron
Visceral
Soupçon
Truculent
Vitriol
Mercurial
Kerfuffle
Sangfroid




























 







Archives
<< current
ARCHIVES
4/27/03 - 5/4/03 5/4/03 - 5/11/03 8/3/03 - 8/10/03 8/10/03 - 8/17/03 8/17/03 - 8/24/03 8/24/03 - 8/31/03 8/31/03 - 9/7/03 9/7/03 - 9/14/03 9/14/03 - 9/21/03 9/21/03 - 9/28/03 9/28/03 - 10/5/03 10/5/03 - 10/12/03 10/12/03 - 10/19/03 10/19/03 - 10/26/03 10/26/03 - 11/2/03 11/2/03 - 11/9/03 11/9/03 - 11/16/03 11/16/03 - 11/23/03 11/23/03 - 11/30/03 11/30/03 - 12/7/03 12/7/03 - 12/14/03 12/14/03 - 12/21/03 12/21/03 - 12/28/03 12/28/03 - 1/4/04 1/4/04 - 1/11/04 1/11/04 - 1/18/04 1/18/04 - 1/25/04 1/25/04 - 2/1/04 2/1/04 - 2/8/04 2/8/04 - 2/15/04 2/15/04 - 2/22/04 2/22/04 - 2/29/04 2/29/04 - 3/7/04 3/7/04 - 3/14/04 3/14/04 - 3/21/04 3/21/04 - 3/28/04 3/28/04 - 4/4/04 4/4/04 - 4/11/04 4/11/04 - 4/18/04 4/18/04 - 4/25/04 4/25/04 - 5/2/04 5/2/04 - 5/9/04 5/9/04 - 5/16/04 5/16/04 - 5/23/04 5/23/04 - 5/30/04 6/6/04 - 6/13/04 6/13/04 - 6/20/04 6/20/04 - 6/27/04 6/27/04 - 7/4/04 7/4/04 - 7/11/04 7/11/04 - 7/18/04 7/18/04 - 7/25/04 7/25/04 - 8/1/04 8/1/04 - 8/8/04 8/8/04 - 8/15/04 8/15/04 - 8/22/04 8/22/04 - 8/29/04 8/29/04 - 9/5/04 9/5/04 - 9/12/04 9/12/04 - 9/19/04 9/19/04 - 9/26/04 9/26/04 - 10/3/04 10/3/04 - 10/10/04 10/10/04 - 10/17/04 10/17/04 - 10/24/04 10/24/04 - 10/31/04 10/31/04 - 11/7/04 11/14/04 - 11/21/04 11/21/04 - 11/28/04 11/28/04 - 12/5/04 12/5/04 - 12/12/04 12/12/04 - 12/19/04 12/19/04 - 12/26/04 12/26/04 - 1/2/05 1/2/05 - 1/9/05 1/9/05 - 1/16/05 1/16/05 - 1/23/05 1/23/05 - 1/30/05 1/30/05 - 2/6/05 2/6/05 - 2/13/05 2/13/05 - 2/20/05 2/20/05 - 2/27/05 2/27/05 - 3/6/05 3/6/05 - 3/13/05 3/13/05 - 3/20/05 3/20/05 - 3/27/05 3/27/05 - 4/3/05 4/3/05 - 4/10/05 4/10/05 - 4/17/05 4/17/05 - 4/24/05 4/24/05 - 5/1/05 5/1/05 - 5/8/05 5/15/05 - 5/22/05 6/5/05 - 6/12/05 7/24/05 - 7/31/05 7/31/05 - 8/7/05 8/7/05 - 8/14/05 8/14/05 - 8/21/05 8/21/05 - 8/28/05 9/4/05 - 9/11/05 9/11/05 - 9/18/05 9/18/05 - 9/25/05 9/25/05 - 10/2/05 10/2/05 - 10/9/05 10/9/05 - 10/16/05 10/16/05 - 10/23/05 10/23/05 - 10/30/05 10/30/05 - 11/6/05 11/6/05 - 11/13/05 11/13/05 - 11/20/05 11/20/05 - 11/27/05 12/4/05 - 12/11/05 12/11/05 - 12/18/05 1/1/06 - 1/8/06 1/8/06 - 1/15/06 1/15/06 - 1/22/06 1/22/06 - 1/29/06 1/29/06 - 2/5/06 2/5/06 - 2/12/06 2/12/06 - 2/19/06 2/19/06 - 2/26/06 2/26/06 - 3/5/06 3/5/06 - 3/12/06 3/12/06 - 3/19/06 3/19/06 - 3/26/06 3/26/06 - 4/2/06 4/2/06 - 4/9/06 4/9/06 - 4/16/06 4/23/06 - 4/30/06 4/30/06 - 5/7/06 5/7/06 - 5/14/06 5/14/06 - 5/21/06 5/21/06 - 5/28/06 6/11/06 - 6/18/06 6/18/06 - 6/25/06 6/25/06 - 7/2/06 7/2/06 - 7/9/06 7/30/06 - 8/6/06 9/10/06 - 9/17/06 9/17/06 - 9/24/06 10/8/06 - 10/15/06 10/29/06 - 11/5/06 11/5/06 - 11/12/06 11/12/06 - 11/19/06 11/26/06 - 12/3/06 12/3/06 - 12/10/06 12/17/06 - 12/24/06 12/24/06 - 12/31/06 12/31/06 - 1/7/07 1/21/07 - 1/28/07 1/28/07 - 2/4/07 2/4/07 - 2/11/07 2/11/07 - 2/18/07 2/18/07 - 2/25/07 2/25/07 - 3/4/07 3/4/07 - 3/11/07 3/11/07 - 3/18/07 3/18/07 - 3/25/07 3/25/07 - 4/1/07 6/24/07 - 7/1/07 7/1/07 - 7/8/07 7/8/07 - 7/15/07 7/15/07 - 7/22/07 7/22/07 - 7/29/07 7/29/07 - 8/5/07 8/5/07 - 8/12/07 8/12/07 - 8/19/07 8/19/07 - 8/26/07 8/26/07 - 9/2/07 9/9/07 - 9/16/07 9/16/07 - 9/23/07 9/23/07 - 9/30/07 9/30/07 - 10/7/07 10/7/07 - 10/14/07 10/14/07 - 10/21/07 11/4/07 - 11/11/07 11/11/07 - 11/18/07 12/9/07 - 12/16/07 1/6/08 - 1/13/08 1/13/08 - 1/20/08 1/27/08 - 2/3/08 2/3/08 - 2/10/08 2/10/08 - 2/17/08 2/24/08 - 3/2/08 3/2/08 - 3/9/08 3/9/08 - 3/16/08 3/16/08 - 3/23/08 3/23/08 - 3/30/08 3/30/08 - 4/6/08 4/6/08 - 4/13/08 4/13/08 - 4/20/08 4/20/08 - 4/27/08 4/27/08 - 5/4/08 5/4/08 - 5/11/08 5/11/08 - 5/18/08 5/18/08 - 5/25/08 5/25/08 - 6/1/08 6/1/08 - 6/8/08 6/15/08 - 6/22/08 6/22/08 - 6/29/08 6/29/08 - 7/6/08 7/13/08 - 7/20/08 7/20/08 - 7/27/08 8/3/08 - 8/10/08 8/10/08 - 8/17/08 8/17/08 - 8/24/08 8/24/08 - 8/31/08 8/31/08 - 9/7/08 9/7/08 - 9/14/08 9/21/08 - 9/28/08 9/28/08 - 10/5/08 10/5/08 - 10/12/08 10/12/08 - 10/19/08 10/19/08 - 10/26/08 10/26/08 - 11/2/08 11/2/08 - 11/9/08 11/9/08 - 11/16/08 11/16/08 - 11/23/08 11/30/08 - 12/7/08 12/7/08 - 12/14/08 12/14/08 - 12/21/08 12/28/08 - 1/4/09 1/4/09 - 1/11/09 1/11/09 - 1/18/09 1/18/09 - 1/25/09 2/1/09 - 2/8/09 2/8/09 - 2/15/09 2/15/09 - 2/22/09 3/29/09 - 4/5/09 5/3/09 - 5/10/09 5/10/09 - 5/17/09 5/17/09 - 5/24/09 5/24/09 - 5/31/09 5/31/09 - 6/7/09 6/7/09 - 6/14/09 6/14/09 - 6/21/09 7/12/09 - 7/19/09 7/19/09 - 7/26/09 7/26/09 - 8/2/09 8/2/09 - 8/9/09 8/9/09 - 8/16/09 8/16/09 - 8/23/09 8/23/09 - 8/30/09 8/30/09 - 9/6/09 9/20/09 - 9/27/09 9/27/09 - 10/4/09 10/4/09 - 10/11/09 10/11/09 - 10/18/09 10/18/09 - 10/25/09 10/25/09 - 11/1/09 11/1/09 - 11/8/09 11/8/09 - 11/15/09 11/15/09 - 11/22/09 11/22/09 - 11/29/09 11/29/09 - 12/6/09 12/6/09 - 12/13/09 12/13/09 - 12/20/09 12/20/09 - 12/27/09 12/27/09 - 1/3/10 1/3/10 - 1/10/10 1/10/10 - 1/17/10 1/17/10 - 1/24/10 1/24/10 - 1/31/10 1/31/10 - 2/7/10 2/7/10 - 2/14/10 2/14/10 - 2/21/10 2/21/10 - 2/28/10 3/14/10 - 3/21/10 3/21/10 - 3/28/10 3/28/10 - 4/4/10 4/4/10 - 4/11/10 4/11/10 - 4/18/10 4/18/10 - 4/25/10 4/25/10 - 5/2/10 5/2/10 - 5/9/10 5/9/10 - 5/16/10 5/16/10 - 5/23/10 5/23/10 - 5/30/10 5/30/10 - 6/6/10 6/6/10 - 6/13/10 6/13/10 - 6/20/10 6/20/10 - 6/27/10 6/27/10 - 7/4/10 7/4/10 - 7/11/10 7/11/10 - 7/18/10 7/18/10 - 7/25/10 7/25/10 - 8/1/10 9/19/10 - 9/26/10 10/3/10 - 10/10/10 10/10/10 - 10/17/10 10/17/10 - 10/24/10 10/24/10 - 10/31/10 10/31/10 - 11/7/10 11/14/10 - 11/21/10 11/28/10 - 12/5/10 12/5/10 - 12/12/10 12/12/10 - 12/19/10 12/19/10 - 12/26/10 12/26/10 - 1/2/11 1/2/11 - 1/9/11 1/9/11 - 1/16/11 1/16/11 - 1/23/11 1/23/11 - 1/30/11 1/30/11 - 2/6/11 2/6/11 - 2/13/11 2/13/11 - 2/20/11 2/20/11 - 2/27/11 2/27/11 - 3/6/11 3/6/11 - 3/13/11 3/13/11 - 3/20/11 3/20/11 - 3/27/11 3/27/11 - 4/3/11 4/3/11 - 4/10/11 4/10/11 - 4/17/11 4/17/11 - 4/24/11 4/24/11 - 5/1/11 5/1/11 - 5/8/11 5/15/11 - 5/22/11 5/22/11 - 5/29/11 5/29/11 - 6/5/11 6/12/11 - 6/19/11 6/19/11 - 6/26/11 6/26/11 - 7/3/11 7/10/11 - 7/17/11 7/31/11 - 8/7/11 8/21/11 - 8/28/11 8/28/11 - 9/4/11 9/18/11 - 9/25/11 9/25/11 - 10/2/11 10/2/11 - 10/9/11 10/9/11 - 10/16/11 10/16/11 - 10/23/11 10/23/11 - 10/30/11 11/6/11 - 11/13/11 11/13/11 - 11/20/11 11/20/11 - 11/27/11 11/27/11 - 12/4/11 12/4/11 - 12/11/11 12/11/11 - 12/18/11 12/25/11 - 1/1/12 1/1/12 - 1/8/12 2/5/12 - 2/12/12 2/19/12 - 2/26/12 3/4/12 - 3/11/12 4/1/12 - 4/8/12 4/15/12 - 4/22/12 4/29/12 - 5/6/12 5/13/12 - 5/20/12 5/20/12 - 5/27/12 6/24/12 - 7/1/12 7/1/12 - 7/8/12 7/8/12 - 7/15/12 7/15/12 - 7/22/12 7/22/12 - 7/29/12 7/29/12 - 8/5/12 8/5/12 - 8/12/12 8/12/12 - 8/19/12 8/19/12 - 8/26/12 8/26/12 - 9/2/12 9/2/12 - 9/9/12 9/9/12 - 9/16/12 9/16/12 - 9/23/12 9/23/12 - 9/30/12 10/7/12 - 10/14/12 10/21/12 - 10/28/12 11/4/12 - 11/11/12 12/9/12 - 12/16/12 12/23/12 - 12/30/12 1/6/13 - 1/13/13 1/13/13 - 1/20/13 1/20/13 - 1/27/13 1/27/13 - 2/3/13 2/3/13 - 2/10/13 2/10/13 - 2/17/13 2/17/13 - 2/24/13 3/3/13 - 3/10/13 3/17/13 - 3/24/13 3/31/13 - 4/7/13 4/7/13 - 4/14/13 4/21/13 - 4/28/13 4/28/13 - 5/5/13 5/5/13 - 5/12/13 5/12/13 - 5/19/13 5/19/13 - 5/26/13 6/16/13 - 6/23/13 6/23/13 - 6/30/13 7/14/13 - 7/21/13 8/11/13 - 8/18/13 8/25/13 - 9/1/13 9/8/13 - 9/15/13 9/22/13 - 9/29/13 10/13/13 - 10/20/13 10/20/13 - 10/27/13 11/10/13 - 11/17/13 12/1/13 - 12/8/13 12/15/13 - 12/22/13 12/29/13 - 1/5/14 6/29/14 - 7/6/14 9/14/14 - 9/21/14 9/21/14 - 9/28/14 10/12/14 - 10/19/14 11/23/14 - 11/30/14 12/7/14 - 12/14/14 12/28/14 - 1/4/15 1/25/15 - 2/1/15 2/8/15 - 2/15/15 2/22/15 - 3/1/15 3/8/15 - 3/15/15 3/15/15 - 3/22/15 3/22/15 - 3/29/15 4/12/15 - 4/19/15 4/19/15 - 4/26/15 5/3/15 - 5/10/15 5/17/15 - 5/24/15 5/24/15 - 5/31/15 6/14/15 - 6/21/15 6/28/15 - 7/5/15 7/5/15 - 7/12/15 7/19/15 - 7/26/15 8/16/15 - 8/23/15 11/6/16 - 11/13/16 6/24/18 - 7/1/18 3/29/20 - 4/5/20 4/19/20 - 4/26/20 4/26/20 - 5/3/20



Highlights from the Archives. Some favorite Trillian moments.

Void, Of Course: Eliminating Expectations and Emotions for a Better Way of Life

200i: iPodyssey

Macs Are from Venus, Windows is from Mars Can a relationship survive across platform barriers?
Jerking Off

Get A Job

Office Church Ladies: A Fieldguide

'Cause I'm a Blonde

True? Honestly? I think not.

A Good Day AND Funyuns?

The Easter Boy

Relationship in the Dumpster

Wedding Dress 4 Sale, Never Worn

Got Friends? Are You Sure? Take This Test

What About Class? Take This Test

A Long Time Ago, in a Galaxy Far Far Away, There Was a Really Bad Movie

May Your Alchemical Process be Complete. Rob Roy Recipe

Good Thing She's Not in a Good Mood Very Often (We Knew it Wouldn't Last)

What Do I Have to Do to Put You in this Car Today?

Of Mice and Me (Killer Cat Strikes in Local Woman's Apartment)

Trillian: The Musical (The Holiday Special)

LA Woman (I Love (Hate) LA)

It is my Cultureth
...and it would suit-eth me kindly to speak-eth in such mannered tongue

Slanglish

It's a Little Bit Me, It's a Little Bit You
Blogging a Legacy for Future Generations


Parents Visiting? Use Trillian's Mantra!

Ghosts of Christmas Past: Mod Hair Ken

Caught Blogging by Mom, Boss or Other

2003 Holiday Sho-Lo/Mullet Awards

Crullers, The Beer Store and Other Saintly Places

Come on Out of that Doghouse! It's a Sunshine Day!

"...I had no idea our CEO is actually Paula Abdul in disguise."

Lap Dance of the Cripple

Of Muppets and American Idols
"I said happier place, not crappier place!"

Finally Off Crutches, Trillian is Emancipated

Payless? Trillian? Shoe Confessions

Reality Wednesday: Extremely Local Pub

Reality Wednesday: Backstage Staging Zone (The Sweater Blog)

The Night Secret Agent Man Shot My Dad

To Dream the Impossible Dream: The Office Karaoke Party

Trillian Flies Economy Class (Prisoner, Cell Block H)

Trillian Visits the Village of the Damned, Takes Drugs, Becomes Delusional and Blogs Her Brains Out

Trillian's Parents are Powerless

Striptease for Spiders: A PETA Charity Event (People for the Ethical Treatment of Arachnids)

What's Up with Trillian and the Richard Branson Worship?

"Screw the French and their politics, give me their cheese!"


















 
Mail Trillian here





Trillian's Guide to the Galaxy gives 5 stars to these places in the Universe:
So much more than fun with fonts, this is a daily dose of visual poetry set against a backdrop of historical trivia. (C'mon, how can you not love a site that notes Wolfman Jack's birthday?!)

CellStories

Alliance for the Great Lakes


Hot, so cool, so cool we're hot.

Ig Nobel Awards

And you think YOU have the worst bridesmaid dress?

Coolest Jewelry in the Universe here (trust Trillian, she knows)

Red Tango

If your boss is an idiot, click here.

Evil Cat Full of Loathing.

Wildlife Works

Detroit Cobras


The Beachwood Reporter is better than not all, but most sex.



Hey! Why not check out some great art and illustration while you're here? Please? It won't hurt and it's free.

Shag

Kii Arens

Tim Biskup

Jeff Soto

Jotto




Get Fuzzy Now!
If you're not getting fuzzy, you should be. All hail Darby Conley. Yes, he's part of the Syndicate. But he's cool.





Who or what is HWNMNBS: (He Whose Name Must Not Be Spoken) Trillian's ex-fiancé. "Issues? What issues?"







Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


< chicago blogs >





Reading blogs at work? Click to escape to a suitable site!

Mamas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up to be Smart Girls
(A Trillian de-composition, to the tune of Mamas, Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be Cowboys)

Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains

Smart girls ain’t easy to love and they’re above playing games
And they’d rather read a book than subvert themselves
Kafka, Beethoven and foreign movies
And each night alone with her cat
And they won’t understand her and she won’t die young
She’ll probably just wither away

Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains

A smart girl loves creaky old libraries and lively debates
Exploring the world and art and witty reparteé
Men who don’t know her won’t like her and those who do
Sometimes won’t know how to take her
She’s rarely wrong but in desperation will play dumb
Because men hate that she’s always right

Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains





























Life(?) of Trillian
Single/Zero

 
Saturday, December 30, 2006  
Happy 2007.

Because you're all so swell I've decided I'm way overdue in giving you all a well deserved present. But. See. Erm. The thing is. Okay, look, we all know I'm beyond broke and in financial ruins. So I can't afford to give you all the kind of swell gifts you deserve. I just don't have that kind of money or credit.

However.

I do have an extensive and diverse music collection.

And I'm in an ongoing process of converting, loading, organizing and editing that collection. So my online music library just keeps getting bigger and more diverse.

So my gift to you is music.

And no, it's not going to be all Pixies all the time. I've got a really huge and broad collection of music. And no, by broad and huge I don't mean Pixies, Breeders, Detroit Cobras, Pretenders and Prince. I mean huger and broader than you probably thought old Trill had in her. Sure, I love rock and roll, yeah, sure, I do. No secret there. But. I love a lot of other music, too. So if you're thinking, "Gee, Trill, thanks for sharing and everything, but I'm not really into the kind of music you're into," you might want to periodically stop in and see what's in the queue. You'll probably hate some of the songs, love some of them and be indifferent about a lot of them.

So, from my iPod to your ears, years of collecting and amassing a huge range of music is at your disposal.

I've got a 4shared account and will load songs into a shared folder there. Anyone can listen to a song in that folder. If you like it, it's yours for the downloading.

Just click on the link which says "Today on Trillian's Pod..." (under the Pod photo, yes, new and improved graphics for the new year!)
The link will take you to 4shared.
Roll over the box with the MP3 icon in it.
A play arrow will appear in the lower left corner of that graphic box.
Double click the arrow.
The song will begin playing.
Explore the page a bit and you will find some other features you might find interesting, especially if you like the song and want to add it to your library. You will also find a comments area. I'll try to leave a comment or two there about the song, feel free to tell the world how much you hate or love the song and what you think about my taste in music, anything you want, but let's keep it on topic, okay? Focus the comments on the song, artist or at least music. No fighting in the War Room! We've had a lot of comment problems in the past so this feature will be eliminated if there's one abusive word or argument directed at a commenter other than me. I have a zero tolerance policy regarding abuse to my readers. If you can't play nice you can't play at all. Feel free to abuse me, I'm asking for it, begging for it, actually, by posting my musical taste for the whole world to hear. So I deserve any criticism for that. But other innocent readers and listeners do not. Clear? Understood? No fighting in the War Room. Period.

Clicking on the Pod photo (not the "Today on Trillian's Pod" link) will take you to the main Trillian Tunes folder where several songs reside. Go there if you want to browse the current offerings, deeper cuts and past weeks' tunes.

FAQ
Is this legal?
Yes. And no. Listening to a file is not illegal. Downloading it, well, that's a gray area. It's up to you and your personal feelings on morals, ethics and the recording industry.
Will I be fined, arrested or hanged for this?
No.
Will Trillian be fined, arrested or hanged for this?
Maybe.
Is this blatant disrespect for recording artists and copyright laws?
Yes. But. It's also exposing artists and songs to people who might then go forth and purchase more music by the artist. So really, it's just marketing and they should be paying me for the endorsement.

8:26 AM

Friday, December 29, 2006  
I had an undate. Yes. It’s come to this. An undate. I thought it was going to be a date but it wasn't. It was, well, I'm not sure what it was but I am sure it wasn't a date.

When you think you can’t sink any lower, someone comes along to prove to you that there are depths of humility and depression yet to explore.

There was this guy I met last Summer. I liked him. A lot. He didn’t like me. Or rather, he liked me, he didn’t like the way I look. He had a whole list of complaints regarding my looks. He was disappointed because he “really thought I was the woman he’d been trying to find for many years.” Personality-wise he said I was perfect. But he couldn’t tolerate my looks. He thought I was too tall for him. And he prefers blue eyes. And blondes. And younger women, girls. He was short. Fat. Older. And bald. By the way. He said I am so tall it made him feel small and whimpy. I made him feel small and whimpy? He is small and whimpy. Those facts have nothing to do with me. But my height accentuates his shortcomings. Please note: I didn’t have a problem with him being short, fat and bald. I liked him. I liked his sense of humor, his intelligence, his spirit of adventure, his eyes, his hands…

Right. So. Not a good match. I took the high road and wished him well. Because, you know, I liked him and I did wish him well. I honestly hoped he found what he was looking for in a woman and life.

Months passed. Many months. I didn’t hear from him. Then I got an email. A holiday-ish email. He wished me happy holidays and hoped I was doing well, said he missed me and wished things had worked out between us because he didn’t think he’d ever meet anyone who could make him think and laugh and “feel good” the way I did.

No. I did not think ‘Hmmmmmm” at this juncture. Men do this to me. They email or call for the sole purpose of telling me how terrific I am and that they wish I was just a little better and different because I am as close to perfect as they’ve ever met. But they don’t do this as a precursor to try to start something romantic. In all the years and all the times this has happened to me I cannot figure out why they actually do it. I think it’s a bout of melancholy and loneliness and longing and they reach out to me because they always got an understanding and sympathetic ear from me. I think they’re in a “misery loves company” mood and they call their ol’ pal Trillian, their agony aunt, to wax wistfully about how I was close but not quite right.

I have no idea why anyone would do this.

I have theories.

They’ve been rejected, their ego is bruised and they want to boost their self-esteem, so they call a woman they rejected to remind themselves that they are too good for at least one other person, so good they had to reject them and leave them hurt and disappointed. It’s a sort of emotional transference and ego boost all rolled into one phone call or email.

Or they’re just insensitive, selfish people who like to rub salt in wounds.

So when I received this email I thought, “Again? Again, Universe? Again you send me this weird dragging up of past hurts and rejection?”

And I didn’t respond. I hit delete and thought good-bye to old garbage.

And a few days later he emailed again, at a different email address, saying that since I didn’t respond to the first email I must not be using that email address anymore so he sent it to another account.

This time I responded.

I said, “Or, the possibility exists that I didn’t respond to your first email because I didn’t feel any need or desire to respond to you. You rejected, insulted and hurt me, remember? You said good-bye and that’s it. Our ships passed and went on their courses leaving each other in the wake.”

He instantly responded saying, “I’m sorry you feel that way. I really liked you a lot. I was actually kind of hoping we could get together next week.”

Oh.

I see.

Well.

Okay.

That’s a new twist to this old routine. I’ve never had a guy call or send that kind of email and actually want to see me again. Well. Apart from HWNMNBS but that whole thing defies any earthly logic or psychology so it doesn’t count. And history proved that he never really wanted to see me in terms of getting back together anyway, so, in a way, yes, it does count. But me falling for it doesn’t count because, well, I’m stupid and blind when it comes to him. Hey. We all have our fatal flaws.

So I’m a little naïve regarding this sort of thing. The constant rejection, insults, hurt and in some cases hostility these calls and emails often bring have left me numb and expectant of the worst. The possibility of a man wanting to see me again never enters my realm of consciousness because it never enters my realm of reality.

These guys simply call or email to tell me how terrific I am, how awful I am and what a shame it is things couldn’t be different between us and away they go.

They never want to see me again. They’re not testing the water to see if I’m still available and interested.

They’re hoping to learn that they left me devastated and in therapy over their rejection. They need an ego boost. And they generally don’t get one from me. Most men don’t know that I’ve had this happen so often that I’m wise and immune to their out of the blue calls or email. Most men don’t know that I have one and only one weak spot in this situation and that spot has been filled by someone I truly love and care about. That spot is filled by someone I had an actual relationship with, someone worthy of the heartache and emotional turmoil the out of the blue calls and email can conjure. There is no room for interest or concern for anyone else in this situation. Yeah. They have no idea who they’re dealing with here.

But. Well. This new old guy, well, I did like him.

So after a little hemming and hawing I responded and agreed to see him again.

Oh Trill, you silly, silly, silly stupid woman.

You know better than to take anyone at face value. You know better than to think a man might be interested in you.

But. I mean. You know. He said he liked me a lot and wanted to see me again. For other women, normal women, that translates to, “I’m stupid and I messed up, I never should have rejected, insulted and hurt you. You’re the best thing that will ever happen to me. I want to see you again. Please forgive me and give me one more chance, let me prove to you that I am worthy of and ready for your affections which will be met and doubled in return.”

If a normal woman agrees to the see-again, they know it’s a date and they know they’ve got the guy eating out of their hand.

But as we all know, I am not a normal woman and people do not treat me normally or behave normally with me. And yes, yes, I had this going through the back of my mind when I agreed to see him, but I was trying to be optimistic and hopeful, you know, the season of wonder and all that crap. I was trying, okay? I was trying. Everyone tells me I have to keep trying, I can’t give up, I have to try. So I did.

I thought I did a pretty good job at getting casually dolled up. I thought I was sending the right mix of open but wary and easy there, boy, not so fast signals. I thought I was in a good emotional place about the whole thing.

No expectations, but open to possibility.

He was happy to see me, he even brought me a present. A photo of us on a date.

Wow, I thought, wow. He saved that? Wow. Okay, maybe this wasn’t as out of the blue as it seemed. Maybe he’s been pining away wondering how to get back in my good graces after what he said and how he treated me.

Or maybe he just wanted to brag about his new fiancée, their trip to Spain and the new condo they’re buying in my neighborhood. Since he’ll be living just a few blocks away he thought we’d probably be running into each other and didn’t see any reason why we can’t all be great friends because the girl he met after me is just terrific, he knows we’d get along great, and, oh, look, here’s a photo of them on that trip to Spain and another one of them in their new condo.

He took great pains to point out all of his fiancée’s lovely physical features. Petite, a size two!, a natural blonde, bright blue eyes, and several inches shorter and several years younger than him. He didn’t mention anything about her personality or intelligence or career. But she’s just terrific, just a terrific girl. He’s never been happier in his life and can’t believe how lucky he is, how things just keep getting better and better, all starting a few days after he rejected me! What a coincidence!

Get this, he thinks I’m a good luck charm. Getting rid of me brought him her! He was feeling upset about hurting me and went to a party and had a little too much to drink. Miss Terrific was there and, well, the next thing you know they’re off to Spain, engaged and buying a condo together! If he had still been with me none of that would have happened.

Yes. That’s exactly what he said.

Now. When I said I wished him well and hoped good things for him, I meant it. And yes, I really am happy for him. His enthusiasm and excitement are obvious. Yay him!

But.

Um.

Yeah.

Did I really need to know this?

Did I really need to know the details?

Or see the photographs?

No.

I did not.

Yes. I was disappointed. And hurt. Which makes me really mad. I let this man hurt and anger me twice.

Maybe if it hadn't come on the heels of holiday cards full of adorable new babies, spouses, new homes, and great successes my friends and family acquired last year. Maybe if I hadn't spent the day hearing about all the great gifts people at work received from their spouses and boyfriends. (An engagement ring! Trips to exotic places! A new car! Just like all the ads on TV!) Maybe if I hadn't been the only single person at the family Christmas dinner table. Maybe if things were just some tiny way different. Maybe then it wouldn't have gotten to me the way it did.

The worst part of this is how stupid I felt, and feel, about thinking maybe he wanted to see me again.

So here’s a lesson, guys, and women, too, when someone you’ve rejected tells you they wish you well and hope you find what you’re looking for, they probably mean it sincerely. But. They’re being good sports and taking the high road, putting your feelings ahead of theirs and letting you off the hook really easy. They could fuss and carry on and stalk and harass you and otherwise turn into the psycho ex-date from Hell. But they don’t. They like you, respect you and your feelings and tell you they wish you well and hope things go well for you. And then they leave you alone. They don’t tell you how upset and hurt they are that things didn’t work out between you. They don’t tell you how deeply wounded they are by the insults you hurled at them or how badly the rejection stings or what a surprise it was because they thought things were going okay. They don’t tell you these things because they’re mature, caring people and know their emotions are theirs to deal with and no longer have anything to do with you. The best and really the only thing to do is be polite and nice and wish them well. Leave a good last impression. Grace. Dignity. Tact. That sort of thing.

You rejected them. This hurt them, either a little or a lot. Respect their feelings. When they said they wished you well and hoped you found what you were looking for they didn’t mean, “…and let me know when you do, in fact tell me all the details and show me photographs of how terrific your life is since you dumped me.”

They were trying to bring some dignity to a miserable situation. They were trying to rise above their feelings of sorrow, anger, betrayal, rejection and whatever else may have happened and leave a good last impression. They were trying to paint a positive face on a bad situation.

Don’t insult them by then bragging about how great things have been for you since then. It's not that they don't care about your great new life, but, well, they don't care. Or they care, but, the care comes with feelings of, "it could have been me sharing this with them, but it's not because they didn't want me. They wanted this new person instead."

If anyone gets to brag or gloat in this situation, it’s the person who was rejected. But even then I take a dim view of that. I have tried to imagine myself behaving this way toward anyone who has rejected me and I can’t get a mental picture of it. Probably because I can’t find a valid reason why I would do this. Maybe if things in my life were to ever go well, a new and better job, a home, heck, even a car, or, gasp, an actual solid relationship, I might understand or feel the need to gloat to a past love interest. But I don’t think so. I think I’d be pretty darned happy just enjoying those new and better things. I don’t think I’d feel a need for validation from someone who didn’t want me. And I don’t think I’d need the vindication of bragging and gloating over someone who rejected me. I could be wrong about that but lucky for me and past male interests my life is going backwards, getting worse instead of better. So it’s doubtful that I’ll get the chance to understand what “success” feels like, or the desire to show it off to former men of interest. So now I’m trying spin this whole thing in a positive light: I have been given the chance to vicariously feel the need to brag and gloat. This former man of interest let me peek into the window of success and the need to show it off to someone they rejected. And I don’t like what I see.

A good lesson learned, albeit one I didn’t really need to learn. But hey, better than sitting home with the dying cat, right?

Yep, that’s what he said to me when we said good-bye. He said, “Now that we’re neighbors we should all go out together!”

I said, “No, thanks anyway. I’m sure you’ll be busy with your new place and I’m sure Miss Terrific will keep your social calendar full.”

“Aw, c’mon Trill, you should go out with us sometime. It’s better than sitting home with a dying cat.”

And for the record, never, at any time, did I indicate that I wasn’t getting out and doing things. For all he knows I'm in a terrific relationship, traveling the world, wildly successful in a new job, and just party, party, party every night. Never, not once, did I indicate that since he rejected me I’ve been sitting home every night with my cat. I'm not, but even if I am or even if I did indicate that was the case, so what?! My cat is dying and what’s wrong with wanting to spend time with him?! But who is he to presume I haven’t met anyone and don’t go out? How dare he? It’s double insulting. Which is the only reason why I can figure he got in touch with me. Maybe he’s feeling insecure with new Miss Terrific Hottie McBody and wanted the ego boost. Maybe he’s just a jerk. Either way I’m a zillion times better off without him in my life.

But.

Still.

I feel absolutely idiotic for thinking, even for a few minutes, that he wanted to see me again. Especially when compared to the photos of his fiancée. I mean, of course at the time I was thinking he wanted to see me again I didn’t know about the fiancée or the trip to Spain or engagement or condo or his ego. If he’d mentioned just one of those things I wouldn’t have agreed to see him again. But he didn’t. And I’m curious why. Why coyly pursue me via email, tell me he wished things had ended differently and that he'd never meet anyone who could make him think and laugh and “feel good” the way I did? Why wait for the un-date to spring the "news" on me?

I have theories, of course. He’s right, we’ll probably see each other in the ‘hood. Probably better to get that out in the open rather than leaving it to a chance surprise encounter. But. He could have just said that in the first email. It didn’t require an un-date. He might be feeling nervous about the looming wedding and new home together and wanting to convince himself he’s doing the right thing. He may have thought seeing me would cement his feelings for her.

Nice. Glad to help with that.

No. I’m not letting this consume me. Too much. But. There are lessons to be learned.

Here they are:

Don’t do this to someone. It’s unnecessary and hurtful.

1:05 PM

Thursday, December 21, 2006  
Jarts anyone?
Sometimes I look back on my childhood and marvel at the fact that I survived to adulthood. I did some stupid stuff. My brother did some stupid stuff. I was often the “assistant” in his stupid stuff endeavors. Our friends and neighbors did stupid stuff. And yet somehow we all made it, we survived childhood.

"It's unclear what effects the Uranium-bearing ores might have had on those few lucky children who received the set, but exposure to the same isotope—U-238—has been linked to Gulf War syndrome, cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma, among other serious ailments. Even more uncertain is the longterm impact of being raised by the kind of nerds who would give their kid an Atomic Energy Lab. "

This fact is now even more amazing to me. Between the two of us (and some hand-me-down toys from older cousins and gifts given to my nieces) my brother and I had almost all of the toys on this list. Our friends and neighbors and nieces had other toys on this list. Suffice to say, with the exception of the Atomic Energy Lab, Power Wheels Motorcycle and Mini Hammock (seriously, you have to see the illustration for this thing. What amazes me is not that kids died in the hammock but that anyone bought the things based on that illustration in the first place), I have close personal experience with most of the toys on this list. The kind of weird thing to me is that neither my brother or I or our parents (or aunts and uncles) were apparently concerned about the safety features (or lack thereof) with these toys. Though for the record I staged a protest over the Cabbage Patch doll. Okay, sure, it was more of a protest on principle than on safety concerns of a chewing doll. Still. I didn't like the thing and didn't like the idea of our family buying into the Cabbage Patch empire. I'm happy to report my niece survived the chewing Cabbage Patch doll with all her digits, nose and hair unscathed. I'm guessing if she doesn't already have recurring nightmares about a demonic doll chewing and chewing and chewing and chewing and gnawing and chewing, she will one day. But because my sister didn't get rid of the doll when it was recalled there's little recourse now. Unless Mattel sees fit to pay for therapy for the emotionally scarred kids who had to deal with the evil maniacally chewing doll at too young of an age.

My nieces (and the rest of my familly) also survived the assault of the Sky Dancers with body parts, a semblance of sanity and most of the household goods unharmed. I will say though, I remember thinking those things might not be appropriate for very young girls unaccustomed to dealing with whirling blades of death. This is the advantage those of us with older brothers have over the girls who live in soft pink cushy households with nothing scarier than a My Little Pony. Those of us with older brothers learn very early that life is not one pink powder puff trip and you better learn how to either duck, fast, or catch objects hurling at you without maiming yourself in the process.

My brother was a Star Wars geek for two weeks back in the '70s. Riding his wave of enthusiasm, my dad made the presumption that my brother also liked Battlestar Gallactica. I don't think my brother actually liked the show, but, he sure did love the rocketeering/missile toys my dad got for him that year. My brother was nearly of legal drinking age when he received this airborne gift, but that didn't stop him and my dad and I from spending countless hours launching Battlestar Gallactica missiles at each other. It brought back all the happy memories of the delightful family bonding time we spent playing with the Star Trek disc launcher, which I notice didn't make the dangerous toys list. Which really surprised me because those things really hurt when they hit you. Those discs packed a powerful amount of velocity punch. My parents replaced the rain gutters on their house a few years ago. My dad took a look at the old gutters when they were on the ground waiting to be hauled away. In the gutter from the second story of the house he found one of those Star Trek discs and a Cylon Ranger among other toys just the right size to be ensnared by a rain gutter when thrown, launched or otherwise set aloft by enthusiastic kids trying to push velocity and height records.


We survived. We became adults. With the exception of me, we've spawned progeny who live in a gentler, more litigious society. Even my brother and cousin escaped the perils of the Bat Masterson Derringer Gun Belt Buckle and went on to father four children between them. And so far none of those children seems to be mutated in ways which might be directly linked to playing with the chemistry lab we all loved to abuse, I mean make educational experiments and fill our heads with scientific wonder. All's well that ends well.

Darwinism at work.

We regularly "played" Jarts, though I don't recall actual rules to the game ever being mentioned. Sometimes, if grandparents were joining in the Jart fun, we'd actually set up the plastic target ring. And stand clear. Way clear. In his later years Grandad had vision problems which were aggravated by Scotch consumption, so when there was a Jart in one hand and a tumbler of Scotch in the other we gave him plenty of space.

But usually we spent our Jart time trying to throw the Jarts over the house (two story) or into the neighbors' yards. I know we weren't the only ones who did this. I know this because seeing a lone Jart on someone's roof was not uncommon. Everyone knew it was the talisman of a failed attempt at an Over the House Jart toss. We were all going for feats of height and distance. And those babies could fly. No surprise, now that I have a few physics classes under my Bat Masterson Derringer Gun Belt, heavily weighted metal spears with fins can really go. Boy can they go. High, long and fast.

One of our Jarts had fin failure after several years of active play. The fin was cracked and eventually split off entirely. But we didn't let that stand in our way of hot Summer backyard fun, oh no, not us! We continued to "play" Jarts but prefaced the game with a pre-game of thumb wrestling. Whomever lost the thumb wrestle got The Bad Jart. The Bad Jart didn't fly very well. And it didn't spike into the earth with a smooth thwwip. It just kind of wobbled slowly and thunked on the ground. This is where I have to raise an eyebrow at my parents: Even after years of "play" (read: dangerous abuse) they tried to find a replacement set of Jarts so we wouldn't have to use the wobbly one. Because, get this, they thought the wobbly one was dangerous. They were disappointed to learn that Jarts were no longer available. I vividly remember my mother lamenting to the manager of the local hardware store which sold backyard Summer fun toys and games, "But our family loves Jarts!" Ahhhh. Simpler times. Times when you could send your kids out in the yard with flying metal spikes and know they wouldn't bug you for a few hours.

And that brings me to Creepy Crawlers. I was the assistant in the Creepy Crawler operation. Creepy Crawler manufacture was my brother's exclusive domain. Even (and probably especially) after he'd long outgrown the age range suggested by the Creepy Crawler people. He'd visit from college and crank up the ol' Creepy Crawler oven and that familiar smell of molten silicon would waft up from the basement. It was about this time I began to realize there's something different, something maybe not quite right about my brother. I was still young and in the specified age range for Creepy Crawlers, but, even I was bored with them. Maybe that's because I'd grown up with them and "assisted" in many Crawler Lab experiments. I was Igor to my brother's Dr. Frankenstein. I collected any small odd bits I could scavenge and gave them to my brother. He would then "enhance" the Creepy Crawler molds by adding the items (frequently broken pieces of Barbie playsets) to the molding process.

But my brother's artistic genius really revealed itself when he would combine pieces of differing Crawlers to create a new species. In his younger years he traded his "hybrid" (read: mutant) Crawlers for goods out on the street. At his peak the "hybrid" Crawlers trade was bringing in a steady supply of hockey cards, Hot Wheels and even a "good" yo-yo which my parents made him give back to the little kid who traded it to him.

My brother either had Teflon fingers or suffered for his art. Because on the few occasions I made Creepy Crawlers I burned my fingers to the level of blisters. Which is why I got into rock tumbling. Less chance of injury and blistering flesh wounds.

I'm kind of surprised at this list, though. My top ten would have included a few different toys. (Though I admit I didn't know anything about the Mini-Hammock or Atomic Energy Lab until I read the low-down on them.)

I'll leave off the snow and Winter related "toys" because they're more sporting equipment, and let's face it, any "toy" designed to be used with snow and ice carries with it intrinsic and assumed health risks and liabilities. If you don't fall on your ass or break a bone while using it you risk hypothermia by using it.

Slinkies. Yes. Really. Slinkies. In the old days Slinkies were metal. A metel coil. A flat edged metal coil. This was problematic because they would get tangled and then bend so the metal was not so much a smooth, slinking coil of steel as a crimped, lumbering misshapen band of metal. This was hazardous because it was a flat edge of metal in a coil. A sharp, flat egde of metal. My pinky still bears the scar of a metal Slinky incident. I was a young innocent victim in this one, I was not misusing the toy. I simply picked it up and it seared through the outside of my pinky. Fortunately it was a clean wound, you know, like the incision of a scalpel or X-acto knife. I never played with a Slinky after that and I still flinch whenever I see any kind of coil.

Clackers. Yes. I survived years of Jarts misuse but within the first five minutes of holding those two giant marbles on a string I a) pinched my finger and b) knocked myself nearly unconscious with a high velocity blow to the forehead and undereye. It should be noted that these were not my Clackers, they belonged to the older sister of a friend. We waited for her to leave for gymnastic practice, sneaked into her bedroom and tried out the contraband toy. The things had long been banned but her sister was apparently one of the early users and had hung onto them long after their popularity had died. Her parents didn't know she still had them and certainly didn't know my friend could gain access to them.

So explaining to her mother and then mine how I managed to get an enormous welt on my forehead and a black eye while playing Junior Scrabble was especially tricky. In the end my friend cracked under the pressure and narked out her sister. Amazingly, my parents didn't punish me too horribly for sneaking into places I shouldn't have been, messing with someone else's stuff without their permission and playing with Clackers. Which my parents had strictly forbidden several years prior. I guess they were just happy I was alive. My mother held me up as an example to all the other mothers regarding the dangers of those ridiculous Clackers. I never bring up the Clacker incident because I'm afraid my parents will realize I really should have been severely punished for all the rules I broke during those few minutes of Clacker experimentation.

Next on the list is Skip-It. You put your foot through a plastic ring until it was tethered around your ankle. Attached to the ring was a rope or cord about 24" long. Attached to the end of the rope was a weighted ball. A weighted ball just large enough to trip over as you began or ended your session with the Skip-It. The basic principle is the old classic prisoner's ball and chain ankle tether. Which should be enough to suggest to parents this is not a toy you really want to give a child you love. Or at least a child under your care. The design of the toy did come in handy one year when my brother dressed up for Halloween as a prisoner. He painted the Skip-It black and wore a striped outfit and won second prize for his costume. The actual object of Skip-It is to set the ball in motion by jumping and spreading your legs faster and faster so that momentum builds and centrifugal force pulls the ball around the ankle to which it's tethered. You have to time your jumps just right or you get tangled in the rope or land on the ball. Either way, you're goin' down. Hard. And worse, once you're down (and probably suffering with a broken wrist or ankle) you've got this ring around your ankle and getting the thing off you is impossible. Oh the times I limped into the house dragging that thing, stuck to my ankle, behind me and then holding up my foot so one of my parents could a) take off my shoe, b) take off the Skip-It and c) assess the bodily damage inflicted while playing with that thing. My parents eventually got it down to a science. As soon as they heard the skipping stop and the tell-tale step, drag, step, drag, my mother would get out the ice pack and my dad would position kitchen chairs across from each other so I could sit down while he ran the damage inventory.

Jarts aren't sounding so bad now, are they?

My all time high ranking injury stat toy is the Slip and Slide. Or as it's more commonly known: The Widowmaker. Cripes. Back in the old days before water parks kids had to rely on their backyards and garden hoses as a way of refuge from the Summer heat. Prior to the Slip and Slide you had swimming pools and sprinklers and that was pretty much it. If you didn't have a pool you had to make the best of it with a spinkler. That is until Slip and Slide came along. My friend had a Slip and Slide. And sizable hill in her back yard. (Well, okay, sizable to a 7-year-old kid.) And three brothers. You do the math.

We had names for all the various moves and styles which could be attempted on the Slip and Slide. Hang Ten, Tummy Rumble, Belly Whomp, Slick Spinaroo, Backbreaker Heartbreaker and Wave Good-bye are just a few which come to mind and are probably fairly self explanatory. Yes, we elevated mere slipping and sliding to an Olympic level. When we were lubed up with sunscreen and wetted down with the hose we were greased lightening. There was literally no stopping us. Literally, you couldn't stop until you hit the end of the plastic. And if the Slip and Slide had been in use for a while, the lawn around the plastic slide was drenched and also very slippery. So usually you didn't stop even when you hit the grass. I'd return home not only bruised and sunburned but also grass stained and ground scraped. It's interesting to note one of my friend's brothers grew up to be a pediatric brain surgeon and another is a Navy Engineer. I'm sure these career choices were made as a direct result of Summers spent abusing the Slip and Slide. (The Navy engineer also had the Johnny Reb Cannon. I remember this because he would sometimes launch cannon balls at us as we slid down the Slip and Slide. See what I mean about brothers lobbing stuff? Slip and Slide, toy cannon...Navy engineer...coincidence? I think not.) I gave up a tooth to the Slip and Slide, fortunately a baby tooth. Others weren't as lucky. By the end of an afternoon on the Slip and Slide the plastic would be glistening in the Sun, the greasy sunscreen slicks pooling with the water to create a blinding prism effect. Sort of like the Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez spill. Too many Slip and Slide related injuries occurred to detail here. Most of them occurred while attempting the Hang Ten maneuver wherein you were to stand all the way down the Slip and Slide, a la surfing. Many of them resulted in trips to the emergency room. None of them should ever have been attempted by anyone not actually employed by Cirque de Soleil.

What I'd really like to know is: What masochistic child hater came up with the idea of giving kids a long, narrow piece of plastic, wetting it down with the garden hose and letting young, barefoot, bathing suit clad kids lubed up with greasy sunscreen have at it? That Atomic Energy Lab with Uranium doesn't sound as maniacal when lined up next to something literally called: Slip. And slide. You slip. And you slide. These are not actions which in any other realm of life one seeks as a way of fun. Slipping and sliding are actions those of us on the higher end of the food chain try to avoid. Warning and safety hazard notes on the box? Why bother? The thing is literally named Slip. And. Slide. Play with this and you will slip and you will slide. Period. End of warning.

I haven't done any research because I don't think I need to dig up facts on this: I'm guessing the masochistic child hater who gave us the Slip and Slide also gave us the Sit and Spin. Here kid, sit yer ass on this lazy susan and see how fast you can spin and how long you can go before you puke. Who is this person who gave the world these evil "toys?" The Grinch?

ADDENDUM:
I spent the holiday with my parents. We shared memories of all the Christmases past. Mostly good memories. Mostly. A few sweetbitter memories which we tried to quickly sweep away with more pleasant memories. Ahhhh, repression.

Toys were discussed. And one of my favorite toys of all time was discussed and subsequently rated as an “eminent peril” toy.

Spirograph.

Yes. The innocent Spirograph. I love Spirograph. It’s undergone a lot of updates and transformations. The current iteration is pretty cool. I have one and gave a few to my mother and her friends in physical therapy. It’s been a terrific aid in my mother's rehabilitation. By the way. It's amazing what physical therapists don't think of in terms of rehabilitation aids. It's really surprising to me they're not very creative. They're all, "ooooh, here's a $200,000 'balance ball' and a $100 jar of Silly Putty." Meanwhile I'm like, "Hey, let's try painting or Spirograph or a game of Barrel of Monkeys!" and the physical therapists get all indignant like, "pssht. Whatever, I have $100 Silly Putty."

Right. Spirograph. It’s evolved into a plastic frame which holds plastic templates with abstract shapes cut into them. The frame holds the template in place. The Spirograph gears are then placed within the shapes and away you go on your dizzying voyage of design and point, line and plane theory.

However, this tame little art project toy has a sinister past. A few glasses of wine and a trip down memory lane dislodged a few repressed memories.

My siblings and cousins are several years older than me. Consequently I had a unique toy experience: My toys were: new and I didn’t have to share them with anyone other than friends; or, very old, very used or very unwanted toys cast off years prior by my siblings or cousins, either next-to-new because they were “stupid” or unwanted toys or dusty and ill working (or nonfunctioning) by the time I got them; or, my siblings’ and cousins’ toys which were meant for much older kids than me.

The Spirograph fell into the last category. Apart from crayons and all the paper I could color provided in steady streams by an uncle who worked at a paper plant in Canada, Spirograph was what launched my career in art. Technically I was much, much too young to attempt Spirographing when I first twirled those pen driven gears over paper. My sister received a Spirograph as a gift, tried it a few times and discarded it. My brother then stealthily snatched up the Spirograph and it resided in his possession for several years.

Fortunately for me, my brother came out of the womb afflicted with OCD. Well. Maybe that’s harsh armchair pop psychology talking. We won’t Dr. Phil my poor brother. It’s not fair to all the people who have bona fide mental illness. My brother is just anal retentive about keeping things neat and orderly. So the Spirograph kit was always perfectly stored in its box. A lot of kids lost one or many of their gears, or they were cracked and the subsequent design would have bumps in it where the pen skipped over the crack. But not our Spirograph. Thanks to my sister who didn’t like it, my anal retentive brother and me, the kid who treated her art supplies like precious and rare metals, the Spirograph in our house had many years of steady use. I started playing with the Spirograph early in life. I watched my brother, studied his technique, and quickly learned how to manipulate the gears and create a dazzling and colorful gallery of modern art. Not bad for a three-year-old.

What’s dangerous about this, you’re thinking?

Well. Back in the old days, the early days of Spirographing, the kit was comprised of several gears which worked in conjunction with each other. All the gears could be mixed and matched to create a never ending stream of infinite design possibilities. But one gear had to be kept in place while the junior artist guided the pen and rotating gear around it.

How to keep that gear in place… How indeed.

Pins.

Short, sharp, pins. The pins were about two centimeters long and very, very sharp. They had a round red ball head on them, sort of like the pins you see on maps demarking battles and wild animal attacks on government display maps and dioramas at national parks.

The pins were pressed through the guide gear, paper and finally: A piece of Styrofoam.

You’re all intelligent people. I think you can figure out the fatal flaw in this system. Styrofoam. Moving, rotating pieces. Sharp pins. Small children’s fingers.

“Here kid, here’s a box of plastic gears, a ball point pen, a piece of Styrofoam and a load of small, sharp pins. Have a blast!”

True, I was a bit, okay, a lot younger than the intended age range of the Spirograph when I first started using it. But. Still. Even an eight or nine-year-old kid probably shouldn’t be playing with a box of small, sharp pins.

I don’t remember too many incidents with the pins, however I do remember pricking my fingers while attempting to pick up the pins from their space in the kit. And I remember a few blood stained Spirograph designs. The junior artist was supposed to reach into a large cluster of sharp pins and pull out a few to hold the gear in place. “Here kid, stick your hand in this mound of sharp pins, pull out a few small, sharp pins, and deftly stick them through miniscule holes in a gear and into Styrofoam.”

Where was DCFS when this toy hit the market?

My mother, however, recalled many surprising and potentially disastrous incidents involved the vacuum cleaner and those small, sharp pins. And shards of those pins shooting through the vacuum bag.

And there were a few incidents involving unsuspecting, un-shoed feet and those pins.

Even if the kid managed to escape those perils, I do remember this: the pins had a way of popping out of the Styrofoam when the pen in rotating gear action really got going.

Friction, plastic and static energy lesson, anyone?

Protective eyewear or perhaps a goalie mask, anyone?

Apparently the makers of the original Spirograph didn’t have a lot of physics classes. Because when things heated up on the circular design lab, the Styrofoam would literally get hot. I remember my hair flying wild all over the place from the static energy build-up. Even if a kid miraculously managed to escape an eye or facial injury from a pin popping up and hitting them, a Spirograph session often resulted in shock zapping sessions with siblings.

Using the Spirograph for 15 or twenty minutes was better than scuffing besocked feet across carpet. Unfortunately there were metal pins involved. The pins which didn’t pop out and disappear on the floor would serve as an electrical conduit for carrying the energy built up between the moving plastic gear and Styrofoam and straight to the unwitting kid’s fingers.

I do remember one particularly long and vigorous Spirographing session resulting in me being nearly thrown the the floor when I ran into the living room to show my designs to my mother. Somehow I escaped shock treatments when I removed the pins (perhaps those red plastic ball heads spared me). But when my mother asked me to turn up the light so she could get a better view of my art, the nano-second my Spirograph charged finger hit the light switch the shock zapped me so hard I felt it in my brain and left me weak in the knees. When my mother rushed to help me she also got shocked, badly.

3:31 PM

Monday, December 18, 2006  
Guys, please, help me and other women. Please explain why intelligent, emotionally well adjusted, professional men are attracted to women whose lives are in perpetual chaos.

They walk among us, these men. They're your friends, family and coworkers. They're normal, regular nice guys who one day wake up and decide to throw their lives into very, um, unusual circumstances for the sake of a woman. And generally not Hottie McBody women, either. Women whose lives are so different from these men, the men we like, that it astounds and confuses us and makes us wonder how they're able to even communicate much less establish a relationship. And yet, somehow, they do. These guys, these good guys, go in, we have to assume with eyes wide open, and embrace the chaos and weirdness, the trouble and sometimes serious legal problems of their new found loves.

I have four real-life examples of men I know very well, friends and family, case studies which baffle even the most romantic minded observers. I thought it was just me who was at a total loss as to what these men see in these women. But lately conversations have turned to concern for these men. People who care about them are worried about them. They’ve become so deeply involved/tangled up with these women they can’t see what’s happening to their lives. I’ve been trying to maintain an attitude of “Hey, it’s none of my business, as long as he’s happy who am I to judge?” But the growing cause for concern in each of these cases is that the men aren’t actually happy and are in fact pretty darned miserable. Yet they are clinging to a seemingly unrealistic hope the woman they are entangled with will change. In every case the men think that they are a positive and stable influence which will ultimately be good for their woman. They think if they live by example and clean up the messes these women have made of their lives that the women will be grateful and happy and miraculously transform into wonderful supportive and caring life partners. And you know, hey, maybe they will. Anything's possible. Everyone deserves as many chances as it takes to get their act together. But as I sit on the sidelines observing some men in the midst of the weirdness, I see the scales tipping the other direction. The men aren't bringing up the women, the women are taking down the men. These once positive, caring, upbeat, professional, fun guys are turning into cynical, suspicious, less than reliable men. They're always late for everything because they're always bailing their woman out of some mess. (Sometimes literally posting bail.) Their friends, family and jobs have to take a back seat because their woman is always in the throws of some emergency they are incapable of handling on their own. At first I wondered what these women did before they met the guys I know. Now I know the sad answer: These women always have a stable of men on call to do everything for them. My friends are just one of many in a long line of men who've served a tour of duty under their women. They're replaceable, and weirdly, I think that's part of the spell they're under: They're competitive and don't want to lose to someone else so they rise to every challenge so no one else has an opportunity to get in there and replace them. That's just a theory.

Increasingly it’s looking like each of them is being manipulated and used. By women who have a proven track record of this behavior. All four of these men entered into the relationships knowing something about their romantic interest “wasn’t quite right.” But they pursued and persisted and got their gal and now they’re in the midst of Maury Povich/Jerry Springer esque drama. One of these men was actually asked to appear on the Maury Povich show. Is if that isn’t scary enough, his comment about the phone call from the Maury Show was, “If it was Dr. Phil I would consider it.” This is a guy who has a graduate degree, 15 years of experience in a very professional industry, volunteers for high profile charities and yet he was willing to risk the slam on his reputation by airing his personal dirty laundry on national television. His girlfriend doesn’t want traditional counseling, you know, in a private office where you go and work on issues, no, she wants to use this guy and their problems as a conduit to appear on television. Why would someone do that? I’ve always wondered about that...and here’s her answer: She thinks it’s an easy way to get discovered by Hollywood talent scouts. Yep. She’s a real smart cookie, fame and fortune are just a Maury Povich show away. The concern here is not for her stupidity, shallowness or (possibly, giving her credit she probably doesn’t deserve) naïveté, but that the man is standing by her and didn’t dump her the second he got the call to be on the show.

I’m getting ahead of things here. Let’s look at the case studies first, shall we?

Case #1
How Trillian Knows Him: Work Associate (not a co-worker)
Age: Mid-thirties
Education: Graduate Degree (Top Tier University)
Family: Stable, “normal”
Past Relationship History: Two long term girlfriends prior to this one.

Case #1 met his current girlfriend on a rare night out at clubs. It wasn’t love at first sight, he wasn’t looking for “anything” other than a night out with his friends. But this woman persisted, gave him her phone number, but he didn’t call her. About a month later he was out with the boys for a bachelor party. They went to the club where the woman persisted with him and what do you know?! She was there, too! It’s fate! Right?! I mean, what are the odds of them being at the same club on the same nights?! Turns out pretty darned good because she’s there almost every night. But that’s only recently come to light. At the time she said she hadn’t been in since the night they first met, it must be fate, he really should call her. And for some as yet unexplained reason, even though he wasn’t “that” interested in her, a few days later he called her. And thus began the downward spiral. He took her to a nice restaurant on their first date. He told her where he was going to take her. So she knew where she was going. And yet when she appeared she was clad in scant club wear, and what little there was of the clothing was skin tight. Not exactly the sort of outfit they see a lot of in this restaurant. He was concerned for her feelings, he thought she simply didn’t understand what kind of restaurant it was or that her outfit would provoke raised eyebrows and scoffs in “that kind” of place. When he suggested a different, more hip, more accepting restaurant she pouted and got angry saying he’d promised to take her to that particular restaurant. So they went. And as predicted the men stared and the women rolled their eyes. She teased and flirted with the men and threw sneers at the women. Case #1 was not used to being with “that kind” of woman and he certainly wasn’t used to dealing with “that kind” of attention. After the date he defended her and got on a high liberal hippie horse saying, “What difference does it make what she wears? She should be able to wear whatever she wants, wherever she wants! People need to be more accepting and less judgmental!” Yeah, okay, sure, we’re with you in theory, but, if a woman goes to what she knows is a conservative venue dressed (barely) like a cage dancer at Club Trance, it’s fair to reason that you are calling attention to yourself and men will stare and women will disapprove.

So, after their first date Case #1 was already overly defensive regarding his date because of something she did and the sexual attention she called to herself.

Two weeks and four dates later she had commandeered part of his closet, most of his dresser and was staying with him because she had a long cab ride home and she preferred to stay with him in the city. Fair enough. I guess.

Except little was revealed about her life. Where she lived, apart from it being a long cab ride, was not revealed. What she did for a living was also a mystery. Family? Friends? Pets? Hobbies? Unknown. She just swooped in and grabbed Case #1 and took over his life. Hey, sometimes love happens that way, right? I mean, it had been a while since his break up and he was thinking it was time to meet someone new, and, well, he did.

Three months into their relationship he was talking about marrying her. Sure, very little was known about her, but what difference does it make? All we have is the here and now, right? And they were having fun. Most of the time, anyway, so it’s all good, right? I mean, the mysterious mobile phone calls she got between the hours of 2 AM and 8 AM, the fact that she always had her mobile phone on her or within reach, her whereabouts during the day, where she lived, her job, the fact that all of her clothes were made of lycra or spandex, all of that’s inconsequential, right?

And then one morning she got a call which set her into a panic. She said, “I have to leave, I’ve got a family emergency, good-bye.” And wasn’t heard from for two weeks. Case #1 was crazy worried about her. She finally left a message for him at work telling him to stop calling her. He did. And the next week the Maury Povich Show called him telling him that his “girlfriend” was going to be on the show and had a surprise for him. Case #1, not familiar with the Maury Povich Show, thought she was going to ask him to marry her.

Time out for a minute. Sometimes in relationships there are signs that things are not as they seem. Maybe it’s odd phone calls, maybe it’s a little too much unexplained cash laying around (or not enough). Just little things that don’t quite add up. You’re not a suspicious person by nature but something’s just not quite right. You choose to ignore the signs thinking, “This person has not betrayed my trust yet, and until they do I’m going to assume the best of them.”

But. When a daytime television show calling asking you to be a guest because your partner has a surprise for you, be afraid, be very afraid.

Fortunately Case #1 didn’t agree to be on Maury. He told the producer who called him to tell his “girlfriend” that he wanted to see her but not on national television.

She eventually called him trying to persuade him to be on the show. She thought it would be “fun” and a “big break” for her because a talent scout might see her and launch her career. What career? was the question on everyone’s lips. The question remains unanswered. She really wanted to see Case #1, though, because she missed him and had a surprise for him.

You know where this is going, don’t you? Yep. Straight to the DNA testing clinic.

The “girlfriend” was pregnant.

She was uncertain who fathered the child.

But wait! There’s more! She already has two children by two other men, one of them: Paternity unknown. So she wanted to go on Maury to get free DNA tests for her two already born children and get in line for a test for her unborn child. Oh. And. Get discovered by a Hollywood talent scout. Apparently she missed the auditions for “American Skanky Ho Idol.”

Here’s the baffling part of this. Case #1, my work associate, a nice, professional, responsible, relationship minded man, wants to try to work things out with this lying, irresponsible skank. He thinks all she needs is a positive influence and the emotional and financial security he can provide for her. He has this fantasy of adopting her children and putting her through college so she can make something of herself. He doesn’t care if the baby she’s carrying is his or not, he loves her and wants to have a life with her and her children, excuse me, “their” children.

I mean, all nice and noble and gee what a swell guy, but um, ya know, he dated some really nice, normal, calm, women who don’t manipulate men with pregnancy. What is it about the lies, the deception, the lycra, the Maury Povich Show and the babies by other men which make her irresistible to him? Why isn’t he running to a) get tested for STDs and b) a lawyer? Putting that elusive and weird thing called love aside, from a point of, “What the heck are you thinking?” why is he so willing and even eager to let this woman into his life? She admits she was having sex with “a lot” of men when she was with him but says she never lied about having children, she never said she didn’t have children. She never said she had children, either, and the whole lie of omission point doesn’t get anywhere with her. I mean, having two children is kind of a big deal. To most people. But not to her. My concern was for the existing children: Where were they when she was spending all that time with Case #1 (and the apparently many other men)? Who was taking care of these kids? Why wasn’t she, their mother, with them? Why would she conveniently not tell Case #1 that she had children? I mean, what the...? It concerns me that Case #1 doesn’t ask these questions. He just accepts her. Which is, you know, nice, but um, well, obviously she’s using him. And yet he doesn’t feel at all used. He feels honored when she finds time to spend with him. He is apparently happy being lied to and manipulated.

It’s his life and each their own, but what I’m wondering is, why is this woman whose life is completely out of control so attractive to him? Why does it not concern him that he was very nearly the unwitting “other man” on a DNA test Maury Povich Show?

Case #2
How Trillian Knows Him: Met as an Online Date (didn’t work out, became friends)
Age: Mid-thirties
Education: Undergraduate Degree (Big Ten University)
Family: Stable, “normal”
Past Relationship History: A very long term girlfriend and two short relationships prior to this one.

I met Case #2 a few years ago when I first tried online dating. He didn’t feel any “chemistry” and to be fair, much as I hate that concept, I didn’t really feel anything special toward him, either. One big issue was that he absolutely did not want children, didn’t want anything to do with kids, didn’t like being around kids, kids? Nope. Uh uh. He’s a neat freak and kids are messy. He likes things planned, orderly and on time. Children tend to disrupt schedules, order and plans. We kept in touch and every now and then we talk or meet for a drink after work.

A few months ago he met a woman online. She lives waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out in the suburbs. The country, actually. He lives in the city. He’s been driving out to her neck of the woods because, well, funny story. At first she told him she doesn’t like the city. After a few dates it came to light that her driver’s license is revoked because of a few, okay, several, DUI offenses. She did a little jail time for one of them but hey, at least now when she drinks or gets high she can’t drive! It’s a little inconvenient because she has three children. By two different men. (Hey, at least she knows who the fathers are...) and her friends or the father of one of the kids has to drive them everywhere. But really it’s not such a big deal because said father of said child still happens to live in their house. Or, well, technically she’s and her kids are living in his house. But what about getting to work? you may be wondering. Funny you should ask about work. Not an issue. The woman has never worked a day in her life. She’s literally never held a job. Ever. She doesn’t want to work. She wants to be home with her kids. Which, you know, hey, that’s a noble desire. One might think one would consider how they are going to feed, shelter, educate and clothe their children before they actually had children, especially if one desires to be a stay at home mom. Because, you know, usually stay-at-home moms have go-to-work husbands or partners. But she found a way around that! She just moved in with her ex boyfriend who happens to be the father of one of her children.

Case #2 knows the living arrangements are not “ideal” and is working two jobs in an effort to save enough money to buy a house big enough for the girlfriend, her three kids and himself. This house will have to be in her town in the country because one of the kids is in school there and she doesn’t want to take him out of that school. He likes the city, he really doesn’t want to move to the suburbs, but hey, what choice does he have? She doesn’t work and can’t drive and there are the children to consider, so he feels the choice is made for him.

I’m not saying I’m a good catch. I’m not saying I don’t have problems. I’m not saying we were a perfect match. But. Given the choice between me, a woman who has a full time professional career and a part time job on nights and weekends to make ends meet, no jail time or DUI or children or ex boyfriends living under my roof, and woman who’s never worked, ever, done time in jail, has a revoked license for DUIs, three children and living with an ex boyfriend, I’m thinking the choice should be a no brainer. Apparently the obvious choice is not me.

I’m not jealous, in fact I really hoped this guy would find someone. I’m just surprised at who he found. The question is, why? Why would a normal, hard working, nice (albeit a little uptight in the schedule and tidiness areas) guy who doesn’t like kids be so drawn to woman who’s lazy, addicted and comes with three children? I can maybe understand changing your mind about kids, but somehow the combination of kids and an addicted mother who refuses to work and lives with an ex boyfriend doesn’t make me think it’s the little ones who won him over and changed his mind about kids. Opposites attract? Maybe. I dunno. Seems kind of extreme.

Case #3
How Trillian Knows Him: Relative
Age: Early-thirties
Education: Graduate Degree
Family: Stable, “normal”
Past Relationship History: Two serious girlfriends

This one sucks. Big time. But, it’s more proof to my strong stance that workplace romances are bad, bad, bad, bad news. Many lessons to be learned here, boys, so read carefully. Case #3 is in the medical profession. He hired an assistant. He fell for the trap and ruin of many a poor medical professional and hired “the hot one” instead of the “older one.” She flirted with him at the interview and he hired her. They were getting freaky in the exam room by the end of the second week she worked there. She moved in with him a month later. Four months after that she came home with an enormous diamond and told, yes, told him they were engaged and she’d bought the ring. This guy hates to shop so he was okay with that. And the thought of having a hot wife instead of just a hot girlfriend was okay with him, too. He was ready to settle down and, he, she was hot. So hot that she’d been a Budweiser Girl and was a swimsuit model. So hot all the male patients wanted her assist them. So hot a couple of new regular patients switched to Case #3, darnedest thing, they all knew the new assistant and had odd and recurring medical conditions and since she was familiar with their health history she took special care of them. In the exam rooms. So hot that whenever she went shopping she’d come home with a bunch of phone numbers from men she met while she was “shopping” with her girlfriends. On Friday nights. So hot she had three different mobile phones, one for family, one for friends and one, well, he never really did know why she had the third one.

One year after he hired her they were married. Two months after that she said she wasn’t feeling well and that she couldn’t go into their office that day. Case #3 called to check on her a few times during the day but when she didn’t answer the phone he just figured she was asleep. When he got home that night the house had been stripped of all the valuables. If it was worth more than $500 it was gone. Furniture, electronics, appliances, family heirlooms, everything had been meticulously removed, clearly a pre-meditated and calculated plan. Case #3 thought they’d been robbed. He cursed the alarm company and then panicked about the safety of his hot bride, who, gosh, what a coincidence, was home sick the very day they were robbed.

Obviously they weren’t robbed. The woman put together this plan the second she laid eyes on him. Looking back on it, she sure did know a lot about pre-nup agreements and divorce laws in their state. Looking back on it it was a little odd that none of her family and only a handful of her friends came to their huge lavish wedding. Looking back on it it’s weird that she didn’t really seem to know a lot about medicine, you know, for a medical assistant. Looking back on it she did have a lot of her swimsuit model photos on different websites. Looking back on it most stores close by 9 or 10 on Friday nights so where was she shopping?

Case #3 has been duped, robbed and used. He’s lost a lot, I mean, a LOT in this whole thing. She drew up a water tight pre-nup and she’s legally entitled to half of everything he ever earns. Thing is, she’s done this before. A man contacted Case #3 and said she’d done the same thing to him. He’s also in the medical profession, she used the exact scam on him just prior to meeting Case #3. So. There’s a chance they can prove that she’s running a scam and maybe get out of their pre-nups. But. Get this. Case #3 wants her to have whatever she wants. Money, stuff, whatever she wants. Because he wants her back. He wants to “work things out” with her. He doesn’t care what she did to him or what she’s done in the past. He just wants her back in his life.

Um. Yeah. Okay. I mean. I know the heartache all too well. And it’s a sad a horrible situation. I know that feeling. I know what it is to know you’ve been duped and treated badly and not care because that person on a bad day is better than anyone else on a good day. I know. I know. Apparently this runs in my family. But. For all his emotional savagery HWNMNBS never stole from me, didn’t marry me for my money (ha! that statement in conjunction with me makes me laugh so hard my stomach hurts) and to my knowledge wasn’t using that money to fund internet porn sites, posing for those sites and providing sexual favors for people met via said sites. Which is exactly what Case #3’s ex was/is doing. On the one hand it’s kinda nice to finally not be the sole source of shame and humiliation in the family, on the other hand I know darned well if she wants to reconcile he will jump at the chance.

Why? Why would a guy do this? Why would a well respected professional want anything to do with a woman who lied, connived, stole, cheated and shamed him? Because she’s hot? Really? I mean, seriously, being hot excuses everything else, even if everything else includes manipulation, thievery and porn?

Case #4
How Trillian Knows Him: Friend
Age: Early forties
Education: Graduate Degree
Family: Stable, “normal”
Past Relationship History: Three long term girlfriends.

Hoooo boy. Where to start with this one. Begin at the end of the beginning. They dated for a few years, she cheated on him. Twice. They broke up. He moved on with his life. For several years he was happily moving forward and upward with his life. He had a couple of good relationships which fizzled. He found the old flame who cheated on him and within a few days they were engaged. Within a few months they were married. She moved into his house. Within a year she “renovated” a spare bedroom. And moved into it because she didn’t want to sleep with him. She’s never lasted at a job more than eight weeks. (Her usual tolerance for a job is about three weeks, but she hung in there at one job, really toughed it out for a whole eight weeks.) She has not worked for the past three years. She claimed to be bi-polar. Case #4 believed this to be true because she had been exhibiting wild mood swings and a violent temper. He begged her to get professional help. She refused. She became more violent went from punching him to throwing things at him and threatening him with knives. He called the police. They made her get counseling. A team of psychologists concluded that she was sane and balanced and was faking bi-polar symptoms to get out of working or sharing affections with her husband. One of the psychologists recommended that my friend be tested for STDs. And yet, he stayed. Because he loves her and knows she has worthwhile qualities and in her own way she loves him. So he’s been providing funds for every whim or class she wants to take. She goes to a lot of self help seminars. Which don’t seem to be helping. Funny how people who are fascinated with pop psychology often “develop” the symptoms they’re studying. Dr. Phil is like drugs to her, every show brings a new symptom or cause for her to try out and blame, another excuse to use for not working, not being affectionate to her husband and basically not doing anything at all except point a finger at other people. Meanwhile, Case #4 is deeply in debt and struggling with emotional problems as a result of dealing with his wife’s make believe emotional problems. Lately she, too, has started stealing. Mainly from his elderly father. But because he and everyone else in the family are so afraid of her they let her get away with it. Yes. She’s manipulating Case #4 and his family. He knows this. And so far, doesn’t care. He feels it’s worth it. There’s something about this woman which captivates him. He doesn’t know what, and increasingly he’s seeing her more for what she really is than the sublime unrealistic version he sees. But. He finds her captivating and mysterious. Which is just another way of saying moody and suspicious. But he says even if he were to find another woman he’d want her to have the same or similar qualities as his wife. He would like it if she would work and contribute to the family income, help pay some of the household expenses or even just pay for her courses and hobbies. But if she doesn’t that’s okay. He’s got a decent job and an okay income, he doesn’t mind sharing, especially when he’s sharing it with one as special as she is.

I’m too close to this one to make too much fun of it. But. The point is that he could have had several different women, professional, intelligent, funny, nice, honest women. But he chose the exact opposite. A lazy, stupid, yelling, mean, liar of a shrew.

Why?

Why do such great guys fall head over heals with really awful women? Or at least women whose lives are complete and utter chaos? Is it the knight in shining armor thing? Is it some need to feel like you have to constantly defend someone? A need to work like a slave to provide a home for a woman who refuses to work? A need to be used and manipulated? A need to feel insecure and unsure of the stability of a relationship? A need to not be able to trust their partner? What is the lure of these women?

People have told me I’m “too nice.” I don’t believe in “too nice.” As long as a person isn’t being taken advantage of there’s no such thing as being too nice. We should all strive to be too nice. Aware, yes, and smart and perceptive enough to know when someone has an ulterior motive, yes. But also nice.

Since I’m obviously totally ignorant when it comes to relationships we can assume I’m completely wrong about my opinion on being too nice. Look at the women these guys date and marry. Those women are certainly not too nice, and they’re calling all the shots, not working, and getting their way, have everything provided to them by men who happily take great pains to give it to them. They are not too nice and they have a supply of men wrapped around their fingers.

This is beyond the bad boy syndrome. Women do like bad boys, oh yeah, we all go through that phase. And we should. We need to go through that phase to learn the allure, though fun for a few moments, comes with long term price tags we can’t afford. We learn we want to spend our emotional dollars on something more stable and trustworthy. We learn we don’t want to feel like crap because of a bad boy we knew was trouble. We learn to spot bad boys and avoid them in the future. Bad boy phases are completely necessary. But. They’re usually phases. Usually (hopefully) very quick phases.

They guys who fall for these women build their lives around them, want them forever and always. This is not a phase, this is some deep need which goes beyond exploring the wild side of life for a few weeks or months.

The lesson I (and other women) learn from this is: Behave badly. Use men. Lie. Cheat. Steal. Treat ‘em like crap. Have a bunch of kids by a bunch of different men, develop addictions, don’t work and generally be a drain on society. Apparently men like that sort of thing.

I’m thinking of changing my online profile to read something like that. It’s a little project I have brewing for the new year. A test case. If you know of a great guy who's head over heels with a woman who is, um, well, not exactly a great catch, send me some examples. I'm not home during the day so I can't use Maury as a classroom on bad behavior so I could use the pointers. I’m kind of scared, though, because I don’t think I’m going to like the results. I have a hunch it’s going to be wildly more popular than my honest, kind, professionally, emotionally balanced profile. Sure, during the holiday season it's easy for me to get my Grinch on, but I'm not sure I'm ready for a meaner tougher Trillian as a way of life.

3:43 PM

Wednesday, December 06, 2006  
There should be an island for misfit people. You know, like on the Rudolph Christmas special with the Island of Misfit Toys where all the odd and unloved toys go live out their days under the rule of King Moonracer. (the debate about what’s “wrong” with the doll rages on, a pop-culture unsolved mystery) The holidays are a difficult time for odd and unloved toys.
 
And they’re not so much fun for us singles, either.
 
So where’s our King Moonracer? Where’s our kind protector to find us and take us to a place where we can find solace with the other misfits who are odd and unloved?
 
Yeah, okay, so we don’t actually live in a claymation world.
 
Still.
 
It’s a good concept. Maybe a little on the Leper colony side of social engineering, but better to find companionship and shared misery with like-afflicted people who understand what you’re going through and feeling than spend days and nights alone or with people who do not have any understanding of your situation.
 
The worst time of year to be odd and/or unloved is the “Holiday” season. And I’m not talking about toys. (seriously, what’s wrong with the doll?) Even, even if a single person is alone by choice, or just love, love, loves the holidays because of all the wonderment and hope, there are facts which cannot be escaped. The holidays are rough on single people. Period.

Look at any television, magazine, newspaper or online ad. Look at billboards and "wish book" catalogs. What do you see? Couples, couples, couples. couples. Love, love, love, love. Big gifts, little gifts, perfect gifts for the perfect love.I know I think this every year. But seriously, this year seems exceptionally bad in the category of Happy Couples and Adorable Children hurled at us to make us singles feel completely unworthy of existence let alone the holiday season. The strong and clear message I have been sent in every, yes, every "Wish Book," Sunday sales supplement, television ad, billboard, banner ad, email solicitation, movie release and even spam is: "This season is all about couples and adorable children. If you're not coupled up or blessed with an adorable child or two, you're not worthy of our advertising dollars and therefore not worthy of the holiday. Now go on, off to the Island of Misfit Toys with you, and don't come back until after Kwanza!"

And just when you thought you were past being hurt and offended by marketing, you realize you have to go out into the madness, either in real life or online, and shop. You have to spend money on gifts.
 
Gifts, of course, are a huge expense for everyone. But. Single people have to spread their holiday spending dollars across their family and friends and carry the burden on their own and only receive one in return. A gift for a couple (or two gifts, one for him, one for her, maybe more if there are children involved) and one gift “from the family” given in return. There’s a huge imbalance here. Sure, you can draw names, but so far that has not proven to really work very well. People rarely adhere to the “rules of exchange” in the name drawing scenario.
 
And no, it’s not about gifts and real friends and family understand you’re single and scraping by on one income and no tax breaks for being married, having children or owning a home. But. That rationale doesn’t assuage the awkward moments when friends and family produce a gift for you and you’ve got nothing or only a small inexpensive token gift to give them. Every year I have the same conversations with friends: No gifts this year! We have these very adult and responsible conversations wherein we discuss the true meaning of the holidays and how great it is just to have good friends and we walk around feeling all warm and fuzzy and so smugly superior because we’re not succumbing to the pressure to buy gifts. And then I go to a party or open my mailbox and what is shoved in my face? Lavishly wrapped gifts from people who vowed with me that we were not exchanging gifts. When I question them why they’ve bought me a present after we agreed we wouldn’t exchange gifts, they say, “Oh, I know, but I couldn’t resist, I saw this and I knew you’d love it.” And I stand there trying to be grateful and remind myself that we had an agreement and they broke the agreement, so it’s not my fault, it’s their’s and they should be the ones feeling guilty, not me. But it doesn’t work that way. They bought me a gift and I have nothing for them. There’s that moment, like when you tell someone you love them and you don’t get an I love you, too, in return, that cuts straight to the heart and soul. Sure, it passes, the awkwardness fades with a lame joke or something in the kitchen suddenly needing a lot of attention, but it’s there. So you have a huge mental note to make sure you give a super swell birthday gift and buy them a holiday gift next year, or better still, give them a “just because we’re good friends” present at some point in the next few months. And no, it shouldn’t be about keeping score or any of the issues in that whole exchange. And it’s really not, most people, well, most mature, decent people, honestly pick up a gift for someone only because they think the recipient will like it. And the recipient should learn to be a gracious recipient and accept these gifts and move on with their life.
 
Yes. I agree. But. We’ve all been in this situation and all the enlightened and gracious tactics in the world will not help ease that awkward moment of realization when there’s a gift being handed to you and you don’t have anything to hand over in return.
 
And no, this is not the private domain of single people, this happens to married people, couples, everyone.
 
But. When you’re single this happens at a higher rate, AND, those gifts just keep on giving, the ribbon around the fancy wrapping isn’t the only string attached. Along with the actual gift there’s guilt (you haven’t got a gift in return) and there’s the implied (or outright spoken) charity. I have a very good friend who habitually gives me very expensive gifts. She and her husband can afford to do this. She wants to do this. She knows I’m struggling financially and that I don’t buy myself much of anything, especially “unnecessary” luxuries. So she’s taken it upon herself to spoil me. Which is really thoughtful and yes, I do appreciate it. But. Sometimes it makes me feel like I’m her personal charity. I know she doesn’t mean to flaunt her wealth, but, when I’m sitting there with a very expensive gift in my lap and handing her something, well, not so expensive and undoubtedly not really wanted, it does tend to bring the huge difference in our lifestyles into sharp focus. It’s not a competition, and I know her intention is not to make me feel inadequate and embarrassed. But. We all know in the moment it’s awkward and uncomfortable. A few of those situations and a person ends up feeling really inadequate and embarrassed about their lifestyle. And if you happen to be single these situations become the events that cloud your perspective on the season. You go home alone with your expensive new gift, you look around at your empty abode, feed the cat and see nothing but an old jar of olives and cat food in the fridge, look at your new gift again and it looks horribly, grotesquely out of place in your humble singles pad. That lovely gift which seemed so sumptuous and festive at the restaurant or at your friend’s house looks like it’s trying to make an escape for the door because it doesn’t belong here. It belongs in much more nicely appointed surroundings. Someone once gave me a really lovely gift. I had it on display in my old apartment. Two different visitors questioned me as to where I got it, implying strongly that I must have stolen it because I could never possibly afford it.Yep, those nice holiday gifts really do keep right on giving all year long.
 
The opposite issue arises, too. Some people view single people as living throw-away lives. So they grab anything, usually one of those factory pre-wrapped generic gadget gifts, and hand it to the single person. “Here’s a little something I picked up for you when I was in line at the grocery.” This is done with an air of “okay, handed over that gift, check it off the list, next!”  Meanwhile, other friends, married friends, are the recipients of lovely items for their home or useful items for parents. What it comes down to is: Some married people are out of touch with single life. They’re busy with new homes and young children. The stuff of singledom is long behind them, forgotten like a bad memory. So when they try to think of a gift for a single friend they draw blanks. All their nifty gift ideas are components of new homes and parenting, nifty stuff for the mini-van and swell stuff for all those new rooms in those new houses. And they have the mindset of, “She’s single and lives in an apartment too small to entertain in or really decorate in any meaningful way, she goes to work and spends time with her cat and that’s the sum total of her life. Apart from a gift card for IKEA, Suit Shack or PetSmart there’s really nothing I can give her so I’ll just give her whatever’s easy and cheap. Like her.”  A few years ago I was invited to the new home of a friend. It was a small party where we all knew each other. I was the only single person there. The host gave all the other women a neato canister filled with lovely (and very expensive) kitchen items. I got a factory pre-wrapped car adapter thing which turns one car gadget slot into two. Oh. And it lights up. I um, don’t own a car. My friend, the host, said, “It’ll be handy when you rent a car for your road trips to your parents'! You can plug in all sorts of things to use in the car!”  I know she meant well. I know she was grasping for an idea for me, but why single me out, literally, by giving me a cheap pre-wrapped gift from Walgreen’s when everyone else is getting a lavish and thoughtful gift for their home? I mean, I’m not ungrateful, really, but I don’t get it. Do you? How could I possible feel anything other than awkward and embarrassed when I opened that gift while everyone else looked on with their by comparison lavish gifts perched in their laps?
 
I know this sounds ungrateful and arrogant and geeze, Trill, we never knew you were so, um, ungracious and, well, catty and mean. It’s nice that you have people who care enough to give you gifts. Not everything is a war against single people. I know. I know. And you’re right, of course. But. If you’re single and haven’t found yourself in one of the above mentioned awkward/embarrassing/chopped liver moments, trust me, you will. And when you go home, alone, and are left pondering the gift and your life, come back and we’ll have a chat.
 
Worse than the gift situation, though, are the invitations. Parties. Holiday parties. Many of them obligatory work related parties. You have to go. Period. You have to at least put in an appearance. Nothing shy of Black Plague will get you off the hook for attending some of these events. Most of the hosts of these events are gracious enough to make sure the invitation reads, “and guest.” Which is super swell. Don’t get me wrong on this score, either. It’s very, very nice of companies and associates to include “and guest,” extending an invitation to a complete stranger of your choice. But. There’s a huge, huge huge amount of pressure in those two words. “And guest.” It takes on a sinister sound and looms like a billboard in the silence of your lonely room at night. If you go solo you spend most of the evening alone because everyone else is there with their guest. You make small talk and meet the “and guests.” And you don’t have a guest to introduce. Because you’re single and flying solo. So you do the obligatory mingling, make sure you get in some face time with the associates who invited you, paint on a pleasant “gosh isn’t this just a lovely event” face and get the heck out of there as soon as you can.  If you drag a friend along, you then have to introduce your guest and it will become obvious you didn’t want to come alone, you couldn’t get a date so you dragged your poor friend along to keep you company. L stands for loser. Next year just go alone wearing a t-shirt which says, “desperate loser who couldn’t get a date.” At least that way you might stand a slim chance of finding a kindred spirit who’s in the same situation rather than giving the appearance you’re there “with someone.”

And then there are the parties at friend's homes. Mirth, merriment and fa la la swutting la la la. I am now officially the only unattached person in my social circles. Apart from a few devoted bachelors who prefer to remain single so they have the option of a different partner every month, I am the only unattached person in my social cirlces. I know other single people, I know other single people exist, so far I'm not the last one on the planet, but it's starting to feel that way. I've always known one or two single people who I could commiserate with over the holidays. Not this year. Even my most cynical and relationship jaded bachelor buddy has a new love in his life. And I'm really happy for him. Don't get me wrong there, either. But. It's gonna be a rough year for me. Lots of invitations, all of them with "and guest" sent by people, friends, who know darned well I don't have an "and guest" to bring to their holiday brunch or cocktail party. I know, I know, this is my issue, my problem, not theirs. All the more reason we need a Misfit Island for people like me. I'll go to these parties because I'm a good friend and I was invited and that's what you do. And I will endure these events, smiling and acting friendly, happy and festive alone at gatherings filled with couples. And children.

On one hand I absolutely adore children and love to spend time with them, but on the other hand having me sit at the kid’s table is not exactly what I had in mind when I accepted the invitation to the holiday brunch at a friend’s house.
 
I honestly believe, because I want to believe, that my friend simply did not have enough space at her dining table to fit all the adults. And since I was the only single guest and because I adore her children, she thought it would be okay to have me sit with the kids. I should note that she didn’t have a place to sit, either, and spent the entire meal standing between the dining room and the kitchen. Other people, more jaded, cynical people, would assume I was invited to serve as a babysitter for the children. This assumption would be made because well, I was offered a seat at the kid’s table, and the kids included the children of all the guests, not just my host’s children, the above mentioned adored ones. I did not know the other kids. Well. I didn’t when I arrived. I certainly did by the time I left. Because once I sat with the kids at the kid’s table, it was apparently assumed that I would “handle” all of the children during the rest of the party. And that’s exactly what happened. Every time I tried to break free from a couple of children to have an adult conversation, two more children would appear proffering a toy or a problem they wanted me to fix. One of the guests, the mother of one of the more rambunctious children, did try to save me from the situation, but, another guest said, “Trillian doesn’t get to spend time with kids very often, she loves it!” and started talking about the new library opening in their suburb leaving me to play several rounds of Don’t Break the Ice with the kids. Basically, yes, I was the babysitter. I didn’t get paid for babysitting services because apparently this was supposed to be a treat for me. Apparently spending this time with several children was seen as a band-aid to stop the pain of my overwound biological clock. How very charitable of them. Yes, I adore my host’s children and love spending time with them, but, the children of near or complete strangers? Not my idea of a good time when I’m there to enjoy a party with adults.
 
If you are planning an event where there will be couples and one single person, please, for the love of Dr. Spock, either do not invite the children of your adult guests, or leave the single person off the invite list for this event. I know it sounds mean and lots of single people wouldn’t mind spending time with kids or surely this won’t happen at your party. Guess again. Try it if you insist on proving me wrong. Invite several couples with children and one single woman. Watch what happens. I’ll give you that pack of Pez I’ve been betting if the single woman isn’t the unofficial babysitter within an hour of her arrival.

And then there are the family gatherings. Year after year after year after year after year us singles traipse to our parents' or siblings' homes to celebrate the holidays. We're always the ones who do the traveling because, har har, there's only one of us and it's easier and less expensive for us to travel than for the other members of the family to pack up their brood and travel. Excuses are always made for siblings who have spouses and children, "Oh, they should spend their holiday in their own home, it's difficult to travel with kids, they want to have their own traditions..." A few years ago I mentioned that I saw an offer for a Christmas vacation package which sounded interesting to me. My mother, who was at the time healthy, gave me such an uncustomary guilt inducing huff and cold shoulder I'm still doubtful as to whether or not it was my real mother. "Oh. I see. That sounds nice. Naturally your father and I just assumed you'd be spending the holiday with us, here, at home, but if you'd rather go on an exotic vacation that's certainly your choice." (It was hardly exotic, by the way.) This is the same woman who begged me to spend Christmas with my fiance, 6,000 miles away. When I had a fiance. I was perceived as an adult capable and needing to fend for myself and make my own plans for holidays when I was part of a couple. Now that I'm single again I'm apparently duty bound and obligated to spend holidays with my parents. Not that I wouldn't anyway, I like my parents and of course I want to spend as many holidays as I can with them, but the assumptions and guilt trips bug me. What if one year I didn't want to deal with the planes, trains and automobiles and all the other holiday travelers? What if I wanted to take that (not so exotic) vacation or, like I'd really like to do this year, stay home with my cat and relax on the one day off not spent in a hospital, doctor's office or veterinary clinic? Anyone sitting there thinking, "Geeze Trill, you're lucky you have parents and a loving family and home to visit for the holidays. You'll regret feeling that way some day," has apparently never traveled during the holidays. Like clockwork, without fail, I travel for Christmas and spend New Year's Eve sick with something I caught while traveling with the masses. Because the fact is that for my one or two days spent with my family, I will spend two days shoulder to shoulder, nose to nose, with millions of complete strangers, most of them sneezing, coughing and green in the face. Yes, I've tried Airborne, and yes, I've still caught one or several illnesses while traveling during the holidays.

But endure this we do, because singles know they want to be with their families because the alternative is complete isolation. And we like our families. Although after a few hours in close confinement with all of them many of us question why we like them. Siblings are partnered up with spouses or boy/girlfriends. Nieces and nephews have boy/girlfriends. Parents. Aunts. Uncles. Cousins. Grandparents. Everyone has someone. Except you. And everyone knows you still don't have anyone and you will naturally be alone again this year and the new boy/girlfriends of relatives raise a suspicious eye at you and there are whispers and you start to feel paranoid amongst your own family. It can really stink. My widowed 87 year old relative has a more active love life than I do. My 15 year old niece has a more active love life than I do. My cousin the most boring CPA ever to walk the Earth has a more booming love life than I do. Even my sister's dog is pregnant. They're all bringing "someone special" to the family holiday gathering.

And yes. It's great to be surrounded by so many happy family members. Of course. But. It hurts, too. It crystallizes some really painful and difficult truths. There's a good possibility this is how it will always be. You are the single one in the family, the one who never got married, the one who shows up alone year after year, the one who watches the little ones while the adults take naps or catch up on gossip, the one who drives the elderly guests home, the one who gets the fruitcake and bath products, the one who will be left standing alone after everyone else has gone home to put a cozy finale on their holiday with their families and partners. That's the loneliest part of the holidays. Everyone's gone home with their gifts and leftover allotment, the kids are exhausted, the adults are craving some romantic couple time, and the single person is standing there waving good-bye, closing the door and is alone. It's the suckiest part of being single during the holidays. Even if you're with family, they're coupled up and want some alone time. I long ago learned to vamoose Christmas night, my parents need some quiet time together to unwind after a very hectic season and holiday. I'm just in the way. I typically go up to my little kid bedroom and try to read and count the hours and minutes until the day is officially over.

I'm posting this because maybe you know a single person and maybe this will help remind you that this is a tough time of year for some people and go easy on them.

We're not Grinchy, we're just sad and lonely. Which I suppose is the same thing, ol' Grinch was just sad and lonely, too. He got stuck traveleing in treacherous conditions, and got stuck tending to the little Whos and had to spend the holiday as a single Grinch with all the paired up Whos.

When I was young and the Universe was just starting to confuse me, I thought it would be nice for King Moonracer to have the Grinch live on Misfit Island so he wouldn't have to be alone up in that mountaintop cave. I couldn't understand why that benevolent flying lion wouldn't see the Grinch on his nightly jaunts around the world looking for misfits to populate his island kingdom. At the time I didn't grasp the difference between animated worlds and claymation worlds. It was just all one big holiday television special universe. Made for television, prettily packaged, merchandised, marketed and conflicts resolved in under an hour with generous time allotments for advertising. You know, just like in real life.

Which is why the Island for Misfits seems like such a good idea to me. The odd and unloved could be sad and lonely together. We wouldn't have to deal with the barrage of holiday marketing assaulting our emotions bringing our single (and presumed pathetic) lives into sharp focus for at least six weeks every year. And we'd be far away from happy festive people who don't want to face the fact that they know or are related to someone who's major holiday buzz kill because they're single.

Why am I such a misfit? I have no idea. A few years ago a friend of mine "joked" that I'm like the doll on Misfit Island. No one has any idea why she's there, but there's something wrong with her, something very wrong. They don't send you to Misfit Island unless there's something very not right with you. But at least you've got the other misfits to hang out with and share the misery of being odd and unloved.

10:40 PM

 
This page is powered by Blogger.