Total Perspective Vortex
What really happened to Trillian? Theories abound, but you can see what she's really been up to on this blog. If you're looking for white mice, depressed robots, or the occasional Pan Galactic Gargleblaster you might be better served here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/guide/.
Don't just sit there angry and ranting, do something constructive.
In the words of Patti Smith (all hail Sister Patti): People have the power.
Contact your elected officials.
Don't be passive = get involved = make a difference.
Words are cool.
The English language is complex, stupid, illogical, confounding, brilliant, beautiful, and fascinating.
Every now and then a word presents itself that typifies all the maddeningly gorgeousness of language. They're the words that give you pause for thought. "Who came up with that word? That's an interesting string of letters." Their beauty doesn't lie in their definition (although that can play a role). It's also not in their onomatopoeia, though that, too, can play a role. Their beauty is in the way their letters combine - the visual poetry of words - and/or the way they sound when spoken. We talk a lot about music we like to hear and art we like to see, so let's all hail the unsung heroes of communication, poetry and life: Words.
Here are some I like. (Not because of their definition.)
Mamas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up to be Smart Girls
(A Trillian de-composition, to the tune of Mamas, Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be Cowboys)
Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains
Smart girls ain’t easy to love and they’re above playing games
And they’d rather read a book than subvert themselves
Kafka, Beethoven and foreign movies
And each night alone with her cat
And they won’t understand her and she won’t die young
She’ll probably just wither away
Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains
A smart girl loves creaky old libraries and lively debates
Exploring the world and art and witty reparteé
Men who don’t know her won’t like her and those who do
Sometimes won’t know how to take her
She’s rarely wrong but in desperation will play dumb
Because men hate that she’s always right
Mama don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
Don’t let them do puzzles and read lots of books
Make ‘em be strippers and dancers and such
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be smart girls
They’ll never find men and they’re always alone
Even though men claim they want brains
Life(?) of Trillian
Single/Zero
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Well, here we go again. Another Valentine's Day in Singleton. Meh. Whatever. Doesn't bother me.
I'm indulging myself in a little dating musing. I'm in an okay place with my Mayor of Singleton status so it seems harmless to reflect on how awful those last few years of dating were for me. I have so much other stuff to deal with in my life that my singleness isn't something I think about very often. And even if everything else in my life was on an even keel, lamenting about being single doesn't solve anything. It sucks, but that's life, deal with it. That's what I tell myself, anyway.
But still, every now and then a little self-pity on a dark night isn't the worst thing a person can do. Sometimes it even leads to new insight. I am kind of surprised how long it's been since I had a date, and how much longer it's been since I went on more than three dates with the same guy. The time hasn't flown by - there are days minutes feel like treacherous death marches - but it has gone by and I have endured it and generally I'm okay with it. This is why I'm the Mayor of Singleton. Next stop, Spinsterville with a detour through Crazy Cat Lady Town.
I was recently asked why I don't date. I was a little stymied by the question. I didn't want to explain why, to this casual acquaintance, it's been years since I've even attempted to find a date. Further, I thought it was obvious why I don't date. I wanted to say, "Look at me. Men are not attracted to women who look like me." But instead I just said, "Oh, you know, unemployment has really taken a toll on me, I'm not in a good emotional place for dating."
I'm pretty sure people don't want to hear the truth, that I quit dating because the rampant judgement on appearance was killing me. No one wants to know that every man I met had a list of attributes they wanted in a date and the first 15 were all appearance based. And that the older I got, the more critical and vocal the men got about their reasons for rejecting me. That I was rejected for many reasons. My eyes weren't the right color, my eyes are too big, I'm too tall, my boobs are too big (yes, really, there are men who don't like big boobs), my fingers were deemed "freakishly long," my nose is "bad," my skin too fair, my hips too curvy, my hair was too short, my hair was too long, my hair was the "wrong" color, my hair wasn't straight enough, (I have been asked to change my hair color and/or style by three different boyfriends and by more first dates than I can recall), even the fact that I have ear lobes disgusted two would-be suitors. And the unanimous catchall: "I'm not attracted to you." Yes, these men are shallow, nitpicking men with questionable priorities.
Or maybe not. Their priority is sex, they know what turns them on, and what turns them off. Why bother wasting any time on a woman who doesn't arouse them? Who cares if she's intelligent, kind, insightful, supportive, loyal, compassionate, creative and has a fantastic sense of humor? If she doesn't get the penis' attention what's the point of spending any time with her? Maybe as a friend, but certainly not as a date or potential romantic partner or spouse. Sheesh, can you imagine spending your life with a woman who has ear lobes?! Shudder. That's just gross.
Do people really want to know all that when they ask why you don't date? Maybe they do. Maybe they want the unvarnished truth about how callous and shallow people can be and how dismissive and cruel people are when it comes to dating. But I kinda doubt people want to know that. I think most people desperately want to believe there's someone for everyone and somehow, someway, love will find a way and everyone gets a happily ever after and the only people who die lonely and unloved are people who deserve it because they're horrible human beings. I'm pretty sure most people want to believe that and they cling to that ideal.
I don't. I have lived the harsh reality of the ugly underbelly of dating. I tried, I got "out there," I didn't let myself get daunted. Determined to find someone, anyone, really, I soldiered on through the mire of dating until finally, after a blind date that ended with a man with Dwarfism humping my knee at a bus stop and then told our mutual friends that I wasn't his cup of tea, that he preferred blondes with blue eyes, instead of saying, "The guy is an arrogant, misogynistic cad who flirts with young bartendresses and humps women's knees at bus stops, and oh yeah, he's a dwarf, and not really in any position to judge anyone on appearance," I said, "No more. This is damaging my self-esteem in ways I can never repair. I'm done."
One battle against anorexia was more than enough in one lifetime for
me. When I saw myself slipping into some dangerous and self-destructive
behaviors, including anorexia, again, and the other tolls trying to date was
taking on my self-esteem and confidence, I got out, I quit trying. The
critical judgement and review on my appearance with every man I
attempted to date was turning me into a psychological, emotional wreck. After each rejection I
consoled myself with, "Who cares what he thinks?" "He's a jerk anyway,
you don't want to date him." "As if he's a fine physical
specimen...pfft!" "If all he cares about is looks, he's not worth your
time." "Don't let him get to you, keep trying, maybe the next guy will
be the guy who has your features on his list." I even joined a dating
site for handicapped people in hopes of meeting a blind man. After one
particularly harsh rejection from a man I dated a few weeks who said he
liked me enough to continue dating me if I was willing to only have sex
from behind because he didn't find me attractive, I got home and looked
in the mirror saw the Elephant Man. Of course I imagined it, I blinked
it away, but that's when I knew it was time to stop dating. That's when I
knew men, and their very specific physical desires, were killing me.
Yes, I wanted a
relationship. No, I didn't want to be alone or lonely. But the man who
finds me attractive enough to look at me during sex, the man who accepts
me - my pale skin that burns even on cloudy days, my dark auburn errant curls
that can be a little unruly, my large green eyes, my "bad" nose, my
5'11" frame that solidly supports natural DD boobs and curvy hips, my
freakishly long fingers (and toes), and yes, even my ear lobes - the man
willing overlook or even embrace all that, remained elusive. And I
wasn't getting any younger.
And that's another issue that
made me realize it was time to opt out of the dating pool: I reached
the age where men my age who aren't married are looking for much
younger women. They're not quite old enough to be the young girls'
father, but old enough to seem "mature" to the young girls, especially
the young girls who yearn for expensive gifts that older, professionally
stable men can provide.
Funny how women are willing to
overlook receding hairlines (or worse: guylights), oversize noses,
stupid facial hair "statements," brutish manpaws (or oddly dainty
mantalons), back hair, all manner of fashion choices gone horribly
wrong, manboobs, and sagging, wrinkled, dangling gonads that can't fuel an
erection without the aid of a prescription drug, but men won't date a woman if her eye color isn't his preference.
I blame the 3:1 ratio
of women to men. Us women know there aren't enough of them for all of us, so
we know that even though we're expected to be perfect specimens of
female beauty we cannot expect men to be camera ready GQ models.
Studies and copious books on this topic say that while men are visual thinkers (translation: penis thinkers), women are more feeling, more
emotional in their choices than men. So if we like a man's personality
traits we "don't even notice" his physical imperfections and, in fact,
find his imperfections attractive. That may be true for some women (like
me, for instance), but that's not the full report. The fact that women
outnumber men* was made obvious to us from the time we started school,
and we know if we want to date and mate we'll have to a) claw our way
over the competition (other women), and b) make a few compromises in our
physical desires.
Yeah, I know how that sounds. I know I
sound bitter, resentful and jaded. But honestly, I am none of those
things. Well, okay, maybe I'm a little jaded. Okay a lot jaded. But I
didn't want to become any of those things. I like men. I don't want to dismiss the entire gender based on the jerks I've met and tried to date.
And I didn't want to lose any
more self-esteem because of some criticism some guy I barely knew
dismissively hurled at me. The men, and their opinions of my looks or
anything else, were inconsequential to me. So why would I let them chip
away at my confidence and self-esteem? Why would I let them push me back
down a slippery slope I already overcame years ago?
If it had been just
an occasional guy with the occasional "I'm just not attracted to you"
every now and then, I would have kept at it, and probably still would be
"at it." But the last five years I was "out there," it was almost every
guy with very specific criticisms (and occasional insults). So. I quit
dating. I realized I had to accept my Singleton spinster fate. I
haven't looked back.
Yes. I get lonely. Very lonely. Yes, I'm pretty
sure that given a legit opportunity I'd do anything (legal) to spend a
few nights with male arms holding me just one more time before I die.
And yes, more than that, especially with what I've had to deal with in
the rest of my life in the past few years, the emotional support of a
partner would make an incredible difference in my life and mental
health. And I like to think that I could make a positive difference in
the life of a man willing to overlook my flaws and accept me.
But.
There isn't someone for everyone. It's statistically impossible. Some
of us are going to be alone. Period. I accept that I am one of them.
Ultimately
the reasons don't matter. And, from experience, I know that trying to
figure out the reasons is the fastest way to lose confidence in yourself
and to escalate all the fallout that low self-esteem brings to the
party.
And let's face it: No one likes a Debbie
Downer. Here's what I finally learned: Smile like you mean it and
eventually you will. Yep. Fake it 'til you make it.
Once
you realize and accept that you're going to be single, forever, there's
a period of depression, followed by anger, followed by anxiety and then
more depression. You might even be tempted to get back "out there" and
try again. And who knows, maybe that'll be the time you find the right
one. Rock on. But. For the rest of us, at some point you have to face
reality: You're single, every relationship you've had has ended in
tears, and if you can get someone to go on a first date with you,
they leave without even lying about calling you, and make it very clear
that they are not attracted to you. It's time to stop the emotional
abuse you're giving yourself over dating.
And you're making yourself a
wreck. Your friends and family are worried about you, you're not
yourself. You're an insecure, frightened, depressed, angry shell of the
person you used to be before the constant cycle of dating and rejection
took a toll on you.
Broken dreams don't mend,
but eventually the edges get worn down and aren't as jagged and sharp.
And I also know this: No matter how much it hurts to think of a future
very different, very much more alone than you imagined for yourself,
facing that future doesn't hurt as much as the constant rejection and
criticism from potential suitors. And it certainly doesn't hurt as much
as being in a relationship with someone who doesn't accept you as you
are. Regardless of what the clinical studies du jour say about married
people/couples living longer and being happier, if the alternative is living with someone who doesn't accept you as you are, you really are better off alone.
That's
not to say that once you accept your singleness that everyday is cotton
candy clouds and soft pink unicorns. (Unless you've opted to medicate
your way through Singleton.) Certain times of the year bombard you with
reminders that you are very much alone. Valentine's Day is one of the
worst. There is a growing anti-Valentine's Day movement, but I
find that to be bitter and cynical. You don't have to hate it, you just
have to have a coping strategy.
I'm a fortunate
Singletonian because I've never been a fan of Valentine's Day. The
commercial pressure factors are a huge part of my disregard for the
"holiday." But the bigger problems I have with it are the competition
and the whole, "If you need a date on a calendar to inspire you to do
something romantic or special for your special someone, then you might
want to reevaluate how special that someone is and if you're really
putting forth the emotional depth and effort relationships require"
aspect. So. Valentine's Day isn't a huge hurdle for me, especially since
I was laid off.
I used to hate Valentine's Day in
the office. Huge bouquets of roses, enormous teddy bears, stupid
balloons, messengers dressed up like Cupid delivering chocolates and
other gifts...the office smelled like a hothouse and the passive
aggression between coworkers was unbearable. "That's a cute bouquet.
Small and sweet. That's nice." The competition for "Most Gross Display
of Commercialization, Affection Category" in the office is sickening. We
spend the year going to great lengths to keep the office desexualized,
and then blam! February 14 it's all about romance and sex. Maybe it's
just me, maybe I'm more bitter than I realize. But. I really do not want
to know that my boss also goes by the name Fuzzylumps or Pookeylips, or
that a pair of edible undies was delivered to the woman who handles
expense reports.
Coping strategy. Devise a plan and stick to it.
Several
years ago I accidentally stumbled upon a little known fact that has
changed my life for the better. This is especially helpful for the
ladies of Singleton, but guys you can modify it to fit your needs.
Gynecologists, even very busy ones, usually have plenty of open
appointments on February 14. Apparently there aren't many women who want
to saddle up in the stirrups and get it on with a speculum on
Valentine's Day. So, for the past eleven years I've had my yearly
gynecologist appointment on Valentine's Day. No one else loves my body,
but I do, and I try to do everything I can to take care of me. Which
means: Annual checkups.
I'm especially pro-pap since Frankie's ovarian
cancer. I've never slacked on my appointments, but Frankie is proof
positive that it's crucial to get an annual pelvic exam. I'm on a mission to remind women to take care of their uteruses (uteri?). Do it. Woman up and get yourself in the stirrups every year. And what better day
to take care of your lady parts than Valentine's Day?
I'm pretty sure
my gynecologist is a lesbian, so the Valentine's Day element in my appointments is a little weird,
but, hey, my vagina is getting some action on Valentine's Day. And I'm
doing something healthy for my uterus, so, you know, win-win. There's
something about enduring a pelvic exam that makes me feel very
virtuous and self-righteous. I always feel like we should get a sticker, like an "I
Voted!" sticker, after an annual checkup. "I Papped!" or "I got in the
stirrups and scootched down!" Okay, maybe the world doesn't need to know
what just went on in my vagina, but, I always feel "good" about having
done it. I was a big girl, I made the appointment, I went, I put on the
scratchy paper gown, I got in the stirrups, I scootched down to the
point where my butt cheeks were dangling over the edge of the table and I
was afraid of falling of the table, I stared at the ceiling and made
pleasant small talk with my doctor while she probed me deeper and harder
than any man ever has, all willingly and because it's the healthy thing
to do. It's what grown up women do. We handle it. We deal with it. We
take care of ourselves. Rock on, sister! And that's a good feeling to
have, so, why not have it on Valentine's Day? Seems absolutely perfect
to me. (I've also heard there aren't many women want their boobs
smooshed and radiated on Valentine's Day, either, so February 14 is a
good day for a mammogram.)
Okay, so maybe a trip to
the gynecologist isn't your idea of a Valentine's Day coping strategy.
But you get my point. Go to the dentist. Take an extra difficult
spinning class at the gym. Eat organic produce all day. Give money to a water or environmental charity. Go play with animals at a shelter. Do something for
yourself that's healthy and makes you feel good and proud of yourself.
Love yourself. Plan it in advance, make a big deal of it.
I don't
recommend "being your own Valentine," as in taking yourself to dinner
or buying yourself a present or sending yourself flowers. I know people,
women especially, who do this and ultimately they end up more depressed
and feeling more lonely. And. They tend to overindulge in
sweets, booze, food or "presents" they can't really afford. Which is why
I advocate something like a gynecologist appointment. It's something
you need to do anyway, it's not something a romantic partner would do
for or with you (at least not usually), so there's no compensation
factor. You're not giving yourself a consolation prize for coming in
last in the game of love, which is how taking yourself to dinner or
having a candlelit romantic bubble bath by yourself or buying yourself
diamond earrings can feel. The last thing you want on Valentine's Day (or any day for that matter) is to end up singing, or worse, feeling like Eleanor Rigby.
Way back when I had boyfriends and reasonably healthy relationships, the guys weren't that different from the men I attempted to date most recently. The long-ago boyfriends were willing to compromise their lists because they thought I had enough other traits to compensate for my shortcomings. Yay them. But that's not to say they entirely forgot about their list of desires.
Valentine's gifts I have received:
A membership at a tanning salon (from the boyfriend who liked Baywatch and very tanned women)
Perfume that made me asthmatic - and also happened to be the scent his mother and sister wore
A 2-for-1 coupon for contact lenses (even though I only wear reading glasses) (from the boyfriend who preferred blue eyed women)
A consultation with a plastic surgeon (from the boyfriend who complained about my nose...nonstop)
A "role playing game" that included a blonde wig for me and...nothing for him. Or, well, "his" role was ogler of the blonde chick (from the boyfriend who liked blondes and asked me, weekly, to "try" going blonde, "just for fun.")
And those were the good guys, the men who (at least said they) loved me and tried to make relationships work with me. The problem was, of course, they never fully accepted me, at least not physically, and they went on to date and marry women who were more to their physical liking.
(And yet people wonder why women develop issues like anorexia, body dysmorphia, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, social anxiety including agoraphobia, stress-related heart disease and run of the mill insecurity and lack of self esteem and confidence issues at staggeringly higher rates than men.)
Guys, please, I'm begging you, if you're going to give your special woman something for Valentine's Day, make sure it's a gift for her, and not really for you. (This includes most lingerie.) If your gal has never gone to tanning salon nor expressed any desire to do so, Valentine's Day is not the day to suggest that you find her lily white skin a little too pale. Maybe you have a weakness for blue eyes and your gal has green eyes. Valentine's Day is not the day to spring the idea of colored contact lenses on her. Nor is it the day to suggest to her that, you know what, her nose could use some refinement or her butt does look big in those jeans or you don't like her ear lobes so here ya go baby, go talk to a plastic surgeon. If she's never so much as tried a few lighter colored highlights, she's probably not interested in becoming a blonde, and if she dons the wig for you, and you ogle her more than you usually do, she will ultimately feel like you want her to be a blonde and will question how much you really enjoyed every sexual encounter you had with her before the blonde wig came into the picture.
So. Tread carefully and think about her. What does she like? If you're the attentive partner you think you are, you've noticed her lingering over a particular catalog or website. Buy her something from one of those places. Perfume is nice, but make sure it's something she likes, and never, ever, under any circumstances, give her the same perfume your mother or sister wears. Just don't. If you have to ask why there's really nothing more I can do to help you.
Okay. Now I'm going to take a moment to do a public service to my sisters who do have men in their lives. See? I don't hate love, I don't begrudge other people who have love in their lives!
If you are a guy who has no intention of buying jewelery, skip ahead.
Jewelry is a typical Valentine's gift. Many women like, and even expect jewelery on Valentine's Day. I'm sorry about that, guys, I don't agree with that either, and please know that some of us women don't expect anything, nor do we buy into the Valentine's Day marketing pressure put on men to buy us something "nice" for Valentine's Day. But if your girl likes, or expects jewelry you probably want to make some sort of jewelry gesture. Word to the wise, though, unless she enjoys reruns of Dr. Quinn: Medicine Woman or '70s made for television mini-series, avoid anything you see advertised on television between Christmas and Valentine's Day. Actually, avoid any jewelry you see advertised on television period. If you do decide to go the jewelry route here are a few cautionary words of wisdom.
1) Type. If you've been dating more than a year, and it's Valentine's Day and you have zero intention of asking her to marry you within the next two weeks, do not, I repeat do not give her any type of jewelry. Why? Because if you've been dating more than a year and you show up on Valentine's Day with a box from a jewelry store, in her mind she's already booking the reception site and band. When she opens the box and finds a solitary teddy bear charm for a Pandora bracelet (that she doesn't own), there is no way to recover the evening. She may be polite and say she loves it and loves you, but don't expect the extra special stuff in the bedroom later. This whole thing could have been avoided if you hadn't given her any jewelry. Why? Because giving her jewelery means you went to a jewelry store, before Valentine's Day, where there were undoubtedly dozens of guys looking at engagement rings, and loads of in-store ads featuring engagement rings, but what did you buy her? A teddy bear charm for a Pandora bracelet (that she doesn't own). The mere fact that you went to a jewelry store is a potential emotional volcano for her, she's just waiting to blow and spew the red hot lava of engagement excitement, and then she opens the box and it's...a teddy bear charm for a Pandora bracelet (that she doesn't own). See what I mean? If you gave her a year of NetFlix she wouldn't be in the bathroom crying and thinking she's wasted more than a year of her life dating you. She wouldn't envision you walking into the jewelry store, choosing just the right gift for her...which turned out to be a teddy bear charm. If you still don't get it, there's nothing more I can do to help you.
If you're already engaged or married, my coupled up friends seem to like/expect diamond earrings, diamond bracelets, or pretty much anything from Cartier or Tiffany & Co. There seems to be some contract between married men and women regarding Valentine's Day and jewelery. Since I'm not married I don't know anything about this other than my married friends typically sprout some lavish new piece of jewelry after February 14.
If you've been dating less than six months and you show up with jewelry, any type of jewelry, she'll be surprised and happy. Unless of course you've been dating less than six months, you haven't met each others' family, you're not even sure what type of wine she likes, and you show up with an engagement ring. She'll be surprised, but maybe not in a good way. Brace yourself for some awkward pauses and throat clearing over dessert.
If you want to buy (or have been instructed to buy) jewelry, but you're not sure what to get, earrings are usually a safe bet. Err on the side of tasteful, birthstones are a nice alternative to diamonds, just make sure you know if she likes yellow or white metals. If you're married, look at her wedding ring. What color is it? Take a snapshot of that in your mind and remember it when you're at the jewelry store.
2) Style. If the woman in your life doesn't wear ruffles, lace and/or ethereal, filmy slip dresses, the odds are high that she probably doesn't like, or want, dainty pieces of jewelry that the salesperson describes as "romantic" or "delicate" or "sweet." Stick with clean lined basics or classics.
On the other hand, if she watches a lot of Hallmark Channel movies and her clothing style is often described as "darling" and she collects Victorian dolls, anything delicate with a lot of detail will probably make her very happy. If your great aunt Polly would like it, you've found the right gift.
Beware of anything shaped like a heart. Hearts are a minefield of opinions among women. Presuming your girl is over the age of 12, she has a personal line in the sand regarding hearts. Some of us hate anything shaped like a heart. Anything. Other women, often women who had (or want) a Disney princess or Hello Kitty themed wedding, love heart shaped everything. So, know your woman and which category she falls into before entering the heart shaped jewelry zone. If in doubt, stay away from the hearts. And it will be difficult. Jewelry stores and the salespeople who work at them are big on pushing heart shaped everything for Valentine's Day. Be strong, do not succumb to the visual overload of hearts in the store.
And. Just because she loves cats or dogs or horses doesn't mean she wants to adorn herself with cute representations of said animals. The same rules about hearts apply here, too. Know your girlfriend and her style. Animal themed pieces are tricky. For instance, even though I love cats, I generally do not like cat themed jewelry. It's a little too crazy spinster cat lady for me. Plus cat themed jewelry is often super cutesy. I am not a super cutesy kinda girl. However, I do have a few pieces of cat inspired jewelry that I really like. Confusing? Yes. So. Unless you have a high degree of confidence in your woman's style, do not presume that because she loves her Bichon Frise more than life itself that she will want to wear Bichon Frise themed earrings. I'm telling you this because animal themed pieces are another type of jewelry that stores and salespeople just love to pawn off on unsuspecting men who think it makes sense that their woman will love anything that represents her favorite animal.
3) Price. This is a touchy topic. If you haven't been behaving like the greatest boyfriend on the planet, this might not be the time to spend a year's salary on jewelry for your girlfriend. Why? Because if she has a functioning brain she's going to presume that you think this lavish gift erases all your boyfriend infractions. And buddy, lemme tell you, nothing is going to eradicate the memory she has of you groping and making out with a bridesmaid at her sister's wedding. Yes, you were drunk, yes, she was wearing the same dress as your girlfriend and you got confused, no "nothing" happened. But. You're on thin ice, mister, and an expensive piece of jewelry is tantamount to an admission of guilt for that indiscretion and many more that she now suspects may have occurred.
If you are Mr. Wonderful and you want to buy her something extra special nice, and you are on solid ground with her taste and style preferences, go for it. Just don't turn into a jerk and lord it over her for the next 10 years. It's not her fault you spent a year's salary on a piece of jewelry, so don't carry it like a cross. Ditto bragging about it to her friends. Trust me, her friends saw it and know how much it cost. The piece brags for itself. Your chiming in and calling attention to the great gift you got her only serves to make you look like a self-serving, ego driven, affected jerk.
4) Diamonds and Rubies and Pearls, oh my. Conventional wisdom is that every woman loves diamonds, that you can't go wrong with diamonds. Conventional wisdom is wrong, and you can go very, very wrong with diamonds, to the point of looking like an insensitive lout. Socially conscious women do not like diamonds, or even if they do, they won't be caught dead wearing them in public. Women who are not ostentatious also don't care for diamonds. And, some women think they're overhyped, overpriced, overused talismans of success in romance and wealth. If you're with a woman who I just described, you probably already know to steer clear of diamonds. If you're not sure, casually mention you saw an interesting documentary on the De Beers family and wait for her response. If this comment turns into a two hour discussion about monopolies and human rights issues then you have your answer. If, on the other hand, she thinks you meant to say, "Da Bears" because she doesn't know who the De Beers family is, you have a very different answer.
Rubies, sapphires and emeralds are diamond alternatives, but these, too, are mined and have human rights issues attached to them. Ask where the stone was mined. The jeweler may lie, but at least you tried to do due diligence. If human rights issues are not an issue for your woman or you, make sure you know what color she likes. She may hate rubies. Just because it's Valentine's Day now doesn't mean she'll want to wear a heart shaped ruby necklace the rest of the year. She may associate sapphires with her grandmother (which could be a good or bad thing). Think about her wardrobe. What colors does she frequently wear? It's a safe bet that she'd like a stone of that color.
Conventional wisdom also indicates that every woman likes pearls. Also false. Most vegans and many vegetarians will not wear pearls. And many women feel that no woman under the age of 60 should wear pearls. Other women feel that pearls should be inherited, not bought.
So. Go carefully into the long dark night of jewelry.
I'm big on personal gifts as opposed to traditional gifts. There's a time and a place for traditional gifts, but Valentine's Day is a very personal day. Ultimately you're hoping to score in bed or at least score some relationship points. Giving her something that says, "I pay attention to you, I care about you and I care about what you enjoy. I put a lot of thought into this because I love you and want you to have something you really want," will go a lot farther than, "I sent a dozen roses to your office, brought you expensive chocolates, I'm taking you to dinner at a trendy restaurant and will give you jewelry during dessert." The former implies you are a thoughtful, attentive guy who's in this relationship for the long haul, which will likely result in some pretty serious spontaneous action, perhaps in an unconventional place, maybe even that thing you like that she's uncomfortable with, while the latter implies that you did everything you're "supposed" to do, you held up your end of the Valentine's Day deal, and that you fully expect her to don some scratchy lace lingerie getup and give you a blow job when you get home. There's no wrong answer, it just depends on what you want from the relationship, and what kind of relationship you want.
Or.
You may have had a conversation that went something like this.
You, mustering your courage and hoping this is the right way to handle this, "Valentine's Day is coming up. What would you like to do? Shall I make dinner reservations or, I could make you dinner at home, or maybe we could go away for a few days. Any thoughts?"
Her, taking deep cleansing breaths so she doesn't lose her temper at you for not "just knowing" what she wants, says, "Surprise me," or, "You haven't made reservations yet? We'll never get in anywhere. Might as well just stay home and order pizza. You better send me flowers at work this year. Good ones, not some cheesy teddy bear holding a carnation."
or, heaving a sigh of relief that you brought up the topic so you can clear the air on Valentine's Day, she says, "I'm so glad you brought this up. I'm not really into Valentine's Day, it's so overhyped and I don't need a date on the calendar to prove how romantic we are. I'm happy just spending the evening home with you."
Both of these scenarios appear to indicate that you've gotten out of planning a Valentine's Day date.
Appearances can be deceiving.
She says it's too late to make plans or that she just wants to cuddle on the couch, which indicates she has zero expectations for a big date night. And she may honestly mean either of those things. But. Deep down she's wondering if (hoping) you brought up the topic as a decoy to throw her off the scent of some big romantic evening you're brewing. Or, she may take you and the conversation at face value and truly not expect anything. But. In either case, if you come up with some sort of romantic gift or plan a nice evening, she'll like it. We all say we don't care about Valentine's Day, and most of us mean it, but, that's not to say we don't appreciate a romantic gesture if the intention is sincere and heartfelt.
And don't forget your single friends and family members. Send them a text or an email, or call them. Don't bring up Valentine's Day unless they mention it first. Just say hi like it's any other day and you're just calling to talk. Maybe mention something about them that you like, say something like, "I was thinking about the time we had that flat tire in the middle of a blizzard. You handled that like a pro. Remember the weird gas station we finally found? Man, what a disaster that day was but I have never laughed so hard in my life." It'll remind them that they have friends and family who care about them and appreciate them, and they'll feel less alone on a day when the entire world except them seems to be coupled up.
*That tide is turning, more boys are being born, now, so in a few generations women will have more choices and less competition in dating. I'm happy for the little girls in kindergarten right now. They aren't facing a future with gender statistics stacked against them in their odds of finding a mate.
I know you expect me to moan about Valentine's Day.
Because I hate this stupid excuse to force romance and affection. It's all a ruse, a marketing ploy, and even when I had boyfriends I refused to be a victim. If you're Catholic you get a free pass (yes, it's technically a Catholic holiday, St. Valentine's Day). If you need Valentine's Day to be romantic, instead of flowers and a box of chocolate you might want to invest in some therapy. Romance...affection...showing it, "proving" it, admitting is, professing it...if you need the marketing hype of Valentine's Day to spur you on or as an "excuse," well, I mean, you know, whatever, I'm not going to judge, but you do realize Cupid doesn't actually exist, right?
Call me cynical, but if I had a significant other who only professed his feelings for me one day a year, I'm pretty sure I would have some serious concerns about the status and future emotional health of that relationship. And if that one day happened to be the heavily hyped and marketed Valentine's Day? Well. Emotion - romance, affection, compassion, passion, love - shown, "proved," no, forced by guilt, appearances and jewelry, card and flower delivery companies isn't exactly the genuine, healthy sort of emotional relationship I want or need.
There. There's my annual Valentine's Day moan. Happy?
Yeah, me either.
I don't hate love.
Really, I don't.
And I don't hate marketing. Really, I don't.
Most marketing is based on triggering an emotional response thus creating a need, a deep emotional need, for a good or service.
So marketing all things romance makes sense. Love is the mother of all emotions, the Big Kahuna. If you're going to market something, go for love. No one can resist it, everyone wants it, needs it, craves it, longs for it, hopes for it, dreams of it and gets high on the feeling of it. Powerful stuff, love. And marketeers know that and use it. Can't blame them. If you're going to evoke emotions, go for the big one. Sex sells, but love sells more and brings in repeat customers.
One really fantastic aspect of being unemployed is that you don't have to endure Valentine's Day in the office. Amen to that, right? Other peoples' romances aren't thrown in your face while you're just trying to do your job.
My Valentine's Day Twilight Zone marathon continues. I feel suitably creeped out and philosophical and definitely not in any way longing for romance or love. Rock on, Rod Serling, my Valentine's Day savior.
But here's the thing.
No, I don't have the big kind of romantic love in my life. And that causes a lot of lonely nights.
But. I do have a lot of love in my life.
And as the Mayor of Singleton I feel it's my duty to provide leadership and guidance through one of the worst days of the year for singles. A moan about it is cathartic, but not helpful. What we, Singletonians, need are survival tactics.
Here's the one that works best for me. It's time tested, mother approved and...it works.
It's not the "buy a nice bottle of champagne, light some candles, take a luxuriously long bubble bath and read a good book, be nice to yourself, love yourself, 'be your own Valentine'" kind of tactic. I mean, you know, that's a good tactic, but it can backfire, badly. It can make you feel even more alone, lonely and pathetic. I know because I've tried that one on more than one Valentine's Day.
Here's another idea.
I've had trouble sleeping since I was a wee tot. This perplexed my mother. She knew I needed a lot more sleep than I was getting but nothing eased or sped my nightly journey to Nod. Songs, stories, counting sheep/kittens/turtles, threats...none of it worked. I couldn't turn off my brain, and mostly, at night, alone, in the dark, sentenced to solitary confinement in my room, I worried. (Yes, I still do this.)
Finally, exasperated, frustrated and tired, one night my wise (and weary) mother said, ""We've read three stories. We sang two songs. Daddy did a stuffed animal re-enactment of Act III of King Lear. That's it, young lady, that is it. Just lie there and think about all the people who love you and all the people you love. Okay? Just think about all the love and happiness you have and don't worry about anything else. All that love is a fortress that will keep out all the scary, mean thoughts. Go. To. Sleep."
It's way better than counting sheep. Mum, Daddy, Gran, Grandad, Nana, Papa, Aunt Daphne...the list included far-flung cousins, friends, neighbors, sometimes even my brother and sister and on particularly difficult nights, every member of our church.
This technique tied in nicely with my parents' ongoing lesson of: "Find contentment within yourself, be happy with what you have, count your blessings. Longing for things only leads to sadness, discontent and an empty life." If I had a penny for every time in my life I've heard, "Find happiness with what you have, not sadness about what you don't," I'd be very happy with all the money I'd have.
And of course it's true. Of course they're right. But. They had good jobs that provided a nice home and a few extras, and, oh yeah, a really solid, good, healthy marriage. So, yes, it was easy for them to go around spouting all zen and hippie-love.
Still.
They're right, you know.
Of course they're right.
Love is not all you need.
Would that it were, of course. Wouldn't that be a pleasant world? But that place doesn't exist for most of us. Most of us do not live in a clothing optional commune where we grow our own food and make vegan soap and pottery to sell at local craft fairs and support the commune.
The notion that love is all you need is ridiculous, foolish and drug-induced fantasizing.
As a review of my nightly list of people who love me and who I love will attest, I have a whole freaking lot of love in my life. But it's not getting me a job, paying my mortgage, or even fulfilling all my emotional needs, and it's especially not fulfilling the biological/hormonal needs. Love is clearly not all I need.
But.
Night after night, when the anxiety, stress, worry and fear are making their nightly rounds in my head and bed, invoking my mother's plan to list off all the people who love me and the people I love as a fortress against the hate and loneliness and fear in life does, you, know, help.
No, you can't roll over and cuddle up to thoughts of people who love you. And most of those people, even though they love you, would probably not want you to roll over and cuddle up to them.
Though. I will openly admit, that after my dad died and there was a house full of relatives, one of my cousins, who I see only at family weddings and funerals, came down to the living room where I was "sleeping" on an air mattress. She couldn't sleep, either. So she sat down next to me on the air mattress and we talked. It was like when we were kids and had to sleep on the floor at our aunt and uncles house. Their den was full of scary stuff and two little girls with overactive and vivid imaginations had a hard time sleeping in there. We surrounded ourselves with the couch cushions and our stuffed animals and hunkered down together. That night, after my dad died, we cried, and eventually we did cuddle up to each other. No, it wasn't some incestuous back-woods lesbian thing. Though we did get a few laughs about it giving new, modern meaning to "sleeping with my cousin."
And at night, when I count her in my list of people who love me, I chuckle at that shared laugh.
Ahhh, love. 'Tis naught more than a shared laugh, n'est-ce pas?
I don't need anyone to prove they love me. I know the people who love me really love me. They don't even need to say it. It's just...obvious. Shared laughs. Shared tears. Shared insights. Shared burdens.
One of the more complex love relationships is the one we have with siblings. For me, it's the most complex. My brother and sister...oh, man, I mean, sigh. It's complicated. We're adults and it bugs the crap out of me that either one of them can reduce me to a 5-year-old in seconds flat. Three adults. Who, by all outward appearances, are mature, reasonable, somewhat sane individuals. But get us together and we're three kids threatening to "tell" on each other. I dunno. I'm not proud of this. But the more I fight it, the more I try to rise above it, the more they push my buttons to invoke the, "I'm telling" response.
But most of the time one of my siblings is capable of doing the very thing I want/need without me even asking or mentioning it.
Today I got the best "Valentine's Day" gift I've ever received.
My brother sent me a whole range of his gently used camera gear. My "good" cameras are film, my digital cameras are either a) crap or b) no longer functioning. My brother's kind of anal, I mean fastidious, and takes impeccable care of his belongings. He could have sold the gear for several thousand dollars. At least. But for some reason, love, perhaps, he instead gave it to me. And yes, I'm telling on him.
It's not about the expense of the camera equipment. It's that he wanted me to have it instead of selling it for a decent amount of cash. The box showed up, completely unexpected, a surprise, for me, on Valentine's Day.
And, that wasn't the only delivery the UPS guy had for me. My parent's neighbors used to do a lot of SCUBA diving, in exotic locations. When they returned from a diving trip they'd invite me over to show me what they found under the sea - exotic shells, coral fragments, sunken treasures from shipwrecks, but mostly photos. Mr. Williams got so he was pretty handy with the underwater camera. They'd pull out a Jacques Cousteau book to correlate their dive to the scientific relevance of the region. That was before Mr. Williams' back and hip started acting up and Mrs. Williams' problems with Lupus prevented them from diving. Lupus, combined with some other health problems, claimed Mrs. Williams a few years ago. Mr. Williams sold their house for a pittance of its value and moved into a retirement condo village. Last Summer I helped him sort through his storage locker, a ton of books and odds and ends their kids didn't want. And hundreds of VHS tapes. I helped him find a place that transfers VHS to DVD. It will come as no surprise that I was one of those nerdy kids who loved Jacques Cousteau documentaries. And of course the Williams' had every Cousteau VHS ever released. Well, yadda yadda yadda my UPS guy brought me a box from Mr. Williams. Every Jacques Cousteau special ever made, transferred to dvd.
Oh. And. A couple books signed by Jacques himself. Oh yes. He did.
It might not be "love" but it's certainly genuine affection. Mr. Williams or his kids could have sold those books for, oh, I dunno, some money. But instead he gave them to me.
And, my mother sent me a care package. Twizzlers and a Snoopy card. I love a Snoopy card. And $20 with a Post-it Note affixed to it saying, "For wine."
I ♥ my mother. Twizzlers, Snoopy and booze. Rock on. Who needs a man with a mother like that?
So.
Do I have a big, romantic Valentine's Day? Not in the usual sense.
But. Do I have lots of love? Yes. I have people who know me, care about me and bother to do nice things for me.
After the UPS guy made his surprise visit I went to the grocery to procure wine, as instructed by my mother.
Wow.
The desperation in the air was palpable. It was late afternoon, normally the first few after-work shoppers would be trickling in. But today, Valentine's Day, the place was thronged with men. Frantic men.
You might be thinking, "Hey, there you go, Trill! What a great time to meet men!"
You would be wrong. Because these men already have someone special. How do I know this? Because they were not flocking to the frozen pizza section.
They were frantically buzzing around the floral/bakery/Valentine's Day candy display section. And the greeting card section. And the "seasonal" aisle. And the booze aisle.
The "good" heart shaped balloons were gone. The ones that remained were already losing helium and buoyancy. Instead of plump mylar hearts with arms jauntily charging in the air, straining on their tethers proclaiming, "I ♥ you THIS much!" there were a few limp, dull mounds of wrinkled plastic, tether strings sagging, mumbling through folds of wrinkled mylar, "♥ yo ch" But these men, these last minute Valentine's Day shoppers, were desperate enough to grab them, snatching them before someone else could. One inventive guy went for a fully inflated SpongeBob balloon. I later saw him in the "seasonal" aisle buying a bag of candy conversation hearts and a garland of red hearts. I could see his plan. Adorn the room with SpongeBob holding the heart garland and litter the pillow with the most romantic candy hearts. I like that guy. I'd date that guy.
The roses, oh swut, the roses. I mean, if you're buying Valentine's Day flowers at a grocery store it's a given that you're not looking to impress and bedazzle someone with gorgeous flowers. On the other hand, props to some groceries for carrying a half-way decent selection of flowers. Mine grocery store generally stocks some nice looking flowers. The roses are usually "meh" but some of the other flowers are quite lovely. They obviously anticipated the Valentine's Day rush and had loads of rose bouquets displayed in various areas around the floral, bakery, booze and check-out areas. They're not stupid, these grocery floral people. But even with the extra floral supply, the choices were getting thin. The red were almost gone, the pink and white were going fast. That leaves orange, yellow and that odd shade of purple-pink no one ever buys because it looks like Pepto-bismol. And the wilty, half-dead red ones. Desperation does funny things to a man. Desperation will convince him to buy the wilty, half-dead red roses from the grocery store, arguing that some flowers are better than no flowers. That SpongeBob balloon and heart garland are sounding better to you now, aren't they?
The bakery department was a hive of activity. The cupcakes were long gone, even the ones with the frosting smooshed on the plastic container lid. The small heart-shaped cakes were going fast and the full-sized heart decorated sheet cakes were moving quickly. These last minute Valentine's Day guys, though, they're creative. You gotta give 'em that. The ones who couldn't get near the remaining heart shaped cakes were swarming around the brownie and cookie displays. Hey, nothing says I love you like oatmeal raisin cookies.
I was on a mission from my mother. I had $20 wine money. I was going to get a bottle of wine. Dammit. The problem, of course, was that all those last-minute-Valentine's Day shopping men were stacked three-deep in the booze aisles. And yes, yes, there were some special displays of booze for Valentine's Day, but there was no getting near them, either. So I waited my "turn" and grabbed the last bottle of Cabernet I could find that fit my under $20 wine budget. I noticed a lot of guys were opting for vodka or beer.
The card section was, of course, a pathetic vignette of desperation and procrastination. Valentine's Day cards hit the shelves around December 28th. If you wait until February 14th to buy a Valentine's Day card...well...how deep is your love? And, when you can't find that "perfect card" at 4:30 PM on February 14th at your local grocery, are you really surprised? Is it not glaringly obvious to you that you might want to consider putting just a tad more effort and planning into your show of affection to the love of your life?
I know I'm cynical about Valentine's Day, but with guys like this, can you blame me? They're obviously just going through the motion, grabbing whatever they can find at the last minute in the easiest place possible because they know they have to show up with something.
I know. I know. Plenty of men, and women, spend a lot of time, money and effort on Valentine's Day and that can be just as desperate and pathetic and feeble as the last minute grocery store Valentine's Day dash. Lavish isn't better, but at least it shows some amount of dedication and thought. (The last minute SpongeBob guy gets a free pass for his originality.)
But, and this is just my skewed perspective, if the choices are: a) a last-minute impertinent grocery-store card/limp balloon or cookie or b) nothing, I'd prefer b, nothing. I don't want anyone to feel they have to "go through the motions." I don't want a "present" procured only because of marketing guilt. I want something like my brother sending me camera equipment or my parents' neighbor sending me Jacques Cousteau dvds and books or my mother sending me a Snoopy card and Twizzlers. Heartfelt, genuine, relevant gifts.
Today the grocery store bakery, floral and booze aisles were filled with men fueled desperation and hope. Tomorrow the same store's ice cream and Tater Tot aisles will be filled with women fueled by broken dreams. And that, my friends, is the definition of Valentine's Day.
Singletonians, instead of counting sheep, go to bed tonight and count the people who love you and the people you love. I'm pretty sure you'll be surprised at how much love you have in your life and you'll feel a lot less alone.
My friend has a big romantic Valentine's weekend surprise lined up for her unsuspecting(!) husband. She made a list of all the pivotal moments of their relationship. Their lives prior to meeting each other. How they met. Their courtship. Their marriage proposal. Their engagement. (Yep, proposal and engagement are two separate, distinct phases.) Their wedding. Their honeymoon. (Yep, again, two distinct phases.) Their newlywed year and first home. (One phase, apparently.) Their dog. Their first pregnancy. Their first childbirth and her quitting her career. Their first house in the suburbs. Their second pregnancy. Their move to their second home in another suburb. Their vacations. (Yep, plural.) Their "oh-god-his-new-assistant-at-work-is-24-and-smokin'-hot." Probably no coincidence the most recent phase of their relationship coinciding with Valentine's Day resulted in her big weekend surprise.
A movie marathon! She chose a movie she felt best represented each pivotal moment in their relationship. Yes. 16 movies. In one weekend. 13 romantic comedies and 3 dramas. Each correlating to a pivotal moment in their relationship.
Okay. I'm single. The Mayor of Singleton. I mean, I'm reallllllllllly single. I don't even think about men or dating or kisses or sex or relationships or, and especially, not romance.
So my take on this is probably very skewed and probably very irrelevant.
But.
I felt a deep, deep moral need to warn my friend's husband about what was really going to happen this weekend while the kids were at his parents'. I felt he should know that in his wife's language "romantic surprise" translates to 16 movies representing their life together. Most of them featuring Meg Ryan, Reese Witherspoon or Renée Zellweger and Hugh Grant. In other words, all of them chick flicks, none of them porn.
I'm single. The Mayor of Singleton. I mean, I'm reallllllllllly single. I don't even think about men or dating or kisses or sex or relationships or, and especially, not romance.
So my take on this is probably very skewed and probably very irrelevant.
But.
I'm reasonably certain a married man with two children living in the suburbs who has a very hot 24-year-old assistant at work doesn't consider a "romantic weekend without the kids" as three days watching his wife's imagined versions of their life acted out in chick flicks. I could be very wrong about this because I'm very single and clearly I know nothing about marriage or men.
But.
I'm reasonably certain a married man with two children living in the suburbs who has a very hot 24-year-old assistant at work thinks a "romantic weekend without the kids" includes "sexy" lingerie ("sexy" in this case means low-rent slutty: lacy, leather/vinyl (or both), itchy and crotchless), porn (including the girl-on-girl stuff) and something from the four basic romantic food groups: something fried, something beer, something pizza, something chip.
Okay. I'm single. The Mayor of Singleton. I mean, I'm reallllllllllly single. I don't even think about men or dating or kisses or sex or relationships or, and especially, not romance.
So my take on this is probably very skewed and probably very irrelevant.
But.
I'm reasonably certain that to a married man with two children living in the suburbs who has a very hot, 24-year-old assistant the only thing worse than a 16 relationship movie marathon would be the opening weekend Saturday afternoon 2-for-1 matinée of the Justin Bieber "documentary."
I tried to warn my friend that her big romantic surprise for her husband might not be met as enthusiastically as she anticipated.
"The thing is, [friend], this is what you want for Valentine's Day. This is what you want him to do for you. You want him to prove his love and respect for your relationship via film portrayals. This is your dream romantic weekend. This is a gift for yourself, not really for him. This might not be what he's expecting for your romantic weekend surprise that requires sending the kids to his parents'."
I crossed a line. She was hurt. Defensive. She expected me to enthuse over her creativity and stand in awe, humbled by her romantic genius. But all I could see was her husband, standing there holding a bottle of champagne and some expensive chocolates expecting slutty lingerie and porn and instead being met with raspberry scones, the cozy movie blanket from the den and 16 chick flicks queued up.
And yes, my allegiance should be to my friend, not her husband. But. In my defense, I was thinking of her. I was trying to spare her the disappointment she'd feel after oh, I dunno, three movies into the marathon when her husband either fell asleep or started Blackberrying for work.
But of course she had to play her winning hand. Married always trumps single. Every game, every time.
"You don't know anything about men. You don't know anything about marriage. Did you ever think maybe this is why your relationships all failed and why no one is interested in you and why you're single? And childless. And unemployed. And moving home with your mother. Huh? Did you ever just once stop to think maybe you have it all wrong, that you don't know anything about men or dating or romance and that's why you're a miserable failure?"
Oh yes she did.
She went there.
And yes, in her eyes, in her world, everything hinges on romantic success. When we were single she always had a boyfriend and at least one or two waiting in the wings. Yes, I knew her when she was unmarried, but I've never known her without a boyfriend. Her motto has always been, "a good man is the best and only accessory a girl needs."
Obviously I have not, and do not, ascribe to her motto. I don't have a motto, but, I think one of the best, if not the only accessory a girl needs is an IQ higher than 124.
But.
I'm single. The Mayor of Singleton. I mean, I'm reallllllllllly single. I don't even think about men or dating or kisses or sex or relationships or, and especially, not romance.
So my take on this is probably very skewed and probably very irrelevant.
And probably very wrong.
I haven't seen much of this friend for a while. We've only recently been in semi-regular contact because I've been seeing more of a mutual friend who lives in the same general suburban direction as her. Suffice it to say we won't be socializing much in the future.
I have tough skin. I've heard everything she accused me of, heck, I've thought it myself. Nothing new there. It's impossible to offend me in any way that I haven't already been offended. She has to dig a lot deeper than that if she wants to really upset me.
But her anger at me, well, you know, that's a bit much. And her complete lack of sense of humor is a turn off to me. And her inability to see from a perspective other than hers is sort of wearying. Now I remember why our friendship faded.
I'm willing to look at my "situation" from other perspectives, in fact that's pretty much all I do, especially these days. I'll take any and all advice. I welcome it.
But. Should I take dating/man advice from a woman whose idea of a romantic surprise for her husband is a movie marathon of 16 chick flicks? Seems counter-intuitive to me.
But.
I'm single. The Mayor of Singleton. I mean, I'm reallllllllllly single. I don't even think about men or dating or kisses or sex or relationships or, and especially, not romance.
So my take on this is probably very skewed and probably very irrelevant.
Our mutual friend heard about the "incident." She showed up early for our metallurgy class so we could "discuss" the "incident."
"You know, Trill, her delivery was all wrong and she has some really messed up ideas about love and life in general. We've always known that. But maybe there's a grain of truth in her message. Maybe you're not, you know, romantic enough. Maybe the few remaining men out there are looking for someone who's a little girlier, a little more romantic than you appear to be."
"I'm romantic."
"I know you are. But I've known you a long time and I know you. I know you're one of the most romantic, sentimental, even sappy people on the planet. But. You're also capable and usually you give the appearance of emotional stability. You don't look like you need a man. And you like hockey and guitars."
"I give the appearance of being a lesbian."
"I didn't say that. Lots of women who aren't lesbians like hockey and metal. I like hockey and metal. It's just, you know, we're not kids, Trill. There aren't many available men out there. Maybe you can't just be you anymore. Maybe you need to play the game, now, at least to initially attract a man."
"We've been having this same conversation for way too many years. I know what I'm supposed to do. I need to be more what men expect, more cliché girl. I'm supposed to play needy and silly, incapable of changing a lightbulb. I'm supposed to be afraid of spiders and not understand how cars work. I'm supposed to pretend I know absolutely nothing about anything remotely scientific and I should never, ever watch NOVA, or at least not openly admit it. It's only okay to talk about accessible art and music - Impressionism and top 40. Knowledge or interest in anything controversial or 'weird' or loud is taboo. I'm supposed to make men feel manly and needed for manly things and in order to do that I have to seem incapable, silly and scared."
"See? You do know the drill."
"Do you think [our friend's] husband will be thrilled about the 16 movie marathon of chick flicks?"
"Of course not."
"How would your husband respond?"
"With divorce papers."
"Exactly. So, if you told her what I said to her it would be valid advice. But because I said it, because I'm a spinster, my reaction and concerns for her are not valid, and further, I'm deserving of ridicule and insult?"
"I know. I know. We know she's nuts. But. That's not the point. The point is that there might be a shred of validity to her rant."
"I should be more girly. Ruffles. Lace. Pink. Ditsy. Stupid. Incapable."
"Well, I mean, you know, you're 5'11". The ruffles and lace are probably not the best choices for you. And I think you're physically and mentally incapable of ditz. But. You know, Trill, you get stuck in the Friend Zone a lot. Guys adore you but they don't love you, you know, romantically."
"Yeah, yeah, I know. I know."
"Why do you think that is, Trill?"
"Because I'm too much woman for them and I intimidate them and so, heartbroken in their abyss of unrequited love for me they're happy to be just friends, protecting their fragile little hearts from being broken?"
"Yeah. I'm sure that's it. Maybe you should spend the weekend recharging your girly batteries. Maybe you should watch 16 chick flicks."
"Yeah, Meg Ryan and Hugh Grant are exactly what I need. I'll emerge all soft and gooey and girly and at least 20 IQ points lower."
"Point taken, but c'mon, Trill, maybe at least try to play the game? Try to be girly?"
"A more appropriate weekend for me would be a Twilight Zone marathon."
Then we went to our class.
And one of our younger classmates was enthusing about her singles-only Valentine's party. Apparently he has lots of single friends. They're going to have a huge anti-Valentine's Day party and celebrate their singleness.
I remember those days. I used to have lots of single friends, too. We all liked being single. And then they all got married. And now it's a party of one.
Because the only single friends I have are: Lesbians and gay men who can't or don't want to get married; and men who have deep rooted commitment issues and will never get married. I have no single girl friends. Not one. And, heck, even one of my commitment-phobe male friends got married last year.
My friend said to our classmate, "Oh! We used to do that! Didn't we Trill?! You should go to her party for singles, Trill!"
Yes. My friend invited me to our classmate's party.
Our classmate was clearly stymied, feeling awkward, "Um, yeah, divorced people are technically single. Most of my friends are around my age, but sure, stop by if you want."
My friend came to my "defense." "Oh, she's not the one thinking about a divorce, and I'm only thinking about a separation, and things are a lot better. We're not getting divorced. And Trillian's not divorced, she's never been married. (grabbing my hand and pointing to my ring finger) She's as single as single can be!"
Our young classmate, clearly feeling even more awkward, just went with it. When things are already awkward why not just say everything you think, because things are already awkward. "You've never been married? You're not divorced? Gawd. Why?!"
Oh yes. She did. She stood there, almost accusatory, mouth agape, gawking at the spinster. And then another even younger classmate joined in. "Wow. You know, my mom has a friend like you."
Yes. She said "like you." Yes. "Like you." As if I'm an exhibit at an endangered species zoo. Or, more accurately, as if I'm like one of the people on the copies of fliers of wanted criminals at the post office. Dangerous. Do not apprehend.
You're probably thinking I'm overreacting, maybe a bit too sensitive. But then another classmate, who is always talking about her husband, and someone who I've befriended and quite like, said, thinking she was coming to my defense, answered for me. "Not everyone is in a rush to get married. I only got married a few years ago. Some of us have other priorities. Travel, careers, lives apart from hunting for a man."
Ahhhhh. A voice of reason. I knew I liked this woman.
And then our younger classmates chimed back at her, "We have all those things. We can have men, too. It's not either/or."
My "recently" married classmate and I shared a knowing smile. Ah, youth.
Suffice it to say I am a) alienated from several of my classmates, b) not attending the singles-only anti-Valentine's Day party and c) watching a Twilight Zone marathon all weekend. Alone. Again. Always.
But.
At least I'm not trapped in the suburbs watching 16 chick flicks.
Friday, February 12, 2010
So, here’s another good thing about unemployment: Not being subjected to the squeals and ooos and ahhhhhs of flowers, candygrams, balloons, plush toy hearts with outstretched arms and kissy lips proclaiming “I love you THIS much!” or plush teddy bears proclaiming “I love you BEARY much!” arriving at the office all day long. And better still, no dealing with the stench of wilting roses in the office after Valentine’s Day. No being surrounded by gifts borne of guilt, social pressure, significant other pressure, futile hopes, desperation and in a few cases, love.
I’m not Jewish so I probably shouldn’t make this assumption, but my guess is that being single in a coupled-up office on Valentine’s Day is like being Jewish on Christmas. Everyone’s all hopped up high on expectant or hopeful hormones waiting for the delivery of some special sign of affection. Just like Christmas. Office cubicles are decorated, red sweaters and festive jewelry are worn. Just like Christmas. Specially decorated treats are brought in – cookies, muffins, donuts, cupcakes, fancy chocolate – all with red frosting sugary décor. Just like Christmas. Some hopes will be disappointingly dashed when no delivery is made, and others will be shocked and surprised by an unexpected show of affection. Just like Christmas. At the very least unsingle people know they’ll go home to the object of their affection and share a bottle of wine, a cuddle, or at the very least won’t eat dinner alone. Just like Christmas. The single person without any prospects knows there will be no delivery for them and they know the evening will be spent like every other evening: nothing special and very much alone and not part of the holiday revelry going on in homes and restaurants across the world. Just like Jewish people on Christmas.
Once I made that connection I started feeling a lot better about Valentine’s Day. I know plenty of Jewish people who enjoy Christmas day. They have their own family traditions or personal rituals they do while the Christian world celebrates Christmas. They may not believe in Jesus but that doesn’t mean they have to feel bad or alone on Christmas day. A few years ago I took a cue from my Jewish friends who spend Christmas day sleeping in late, watching movies, baking cookies, and taking a day off from life. That’s all well and good except that I had to go to work and be confronted with my singleness all day long.
This year, thanks to being laid off, I don’t have to have my singleness thrown in my face. No affronts with roses, candygrams, cuddly toys, and whatever else shows up at the office as a gesture of affection. I can lounge around on my own reclusively hidden away from the romance and marketing hype aimed at couples. (Speaking of marketing hype, have you seen the lamest diamond commercial ever? Someone got paid to produce that embarrassingly smarmy crap? It’s a pulp romance novel cover come to life. However, props to the inadvertent creepiness of the commercial. Weren’t we just talking about slasher movies?)
I have my movie viewing all lined up, some treats ready for the oven and some in-home spa goodies ready to pamper myself. And this year I don’t have to face the world of couples celebrating their love – sincerely or out of guilt and obligation – in the office place. I can spend the day, heck, the whole weekend, alone, cut off from the world of romantic couples. All because I’m unemployed. A nice unforeseen benefit of being laid off.
I know it might seem sad, like an old lady left alone and neglected. But I’m okay with that. It beats the alternative: Navigating a world of couples as a lonely single person.
The thing is, I don’t even care about Valentine’s Day! Even when I was in relationships I found the whole thing a stupid, arcane and forced overmarketed holiday perpetuated by businesses looking to cash in on our most vulnerable weak spot: Love. So it’s not as if I even care about not getting flowers or wined and dined or feeling obligated to don some ridiculous uncomfortable lingerie and perform an impossibly acrobatic Cirque du Sexual (or Sex du Soleil). What matters to me is a genuine, healthy, loving relationship on all the days of the year other than Valentine’s Day.
What bugs me about Valentine’s Day is that it calls attention to single people. It’s supposed to be about love and romance and happy couples, but in celebrating couples in love it makes the singles stand out all the more. We’re conspicuous by omission.
Well, not this year, not me!
I’ve been savoring my 2010 Valentine’s Day victory for a few weeks. The whole merchandising send-up used to fill me with dread. But not this year. This year I scoff at the hearty displays and shoot daggers right back at all those Cupid cherubs strewn about town. “Har har, you don’t scare me! I’m unemployed! I don’t have to deal with you in the office this year! This year no one will know or care that no flowers or candy are delivered to me. This year no one will know or care that I’m home, alone, watching documentaries on the industrial revolution! Ha! Take that, cherubic little Cupid cut-out!”
Then it occurred to me that this is the perfect year to take it a step farther. I’m going to be my own Valentine. I’m going to vow to love me, all day. Shower myself with praise and affection. For one whole day, 24 hours, nothing but self love. And no, I’m not talking about onanism (although…without the pressure of special Cirque du Sexual bedroom gymnastics…). I’m talking about being kind to myself. Treating myself the way I would treat a significant other. Treating myself the way I would want a significant other to treat me. Nothing over the top, just the usual things that I think a lot of couples take for granted.
Tell myself good morning and maybe even a tender I love you upon waking. (Instead of waking up alone, again, and crying because I’m waking up alone, again.) Put the biggest and plumpest blueberries on my cereal. (Instead of denying myself the “good” fruit.) Write myself a short note of praise for a few small things like how I’m supportive of other people or the funny way I air guitar to AC/DC. (Instead of criticizing myself for not being smart enough, clever enough, pretty enough, and generally not good enough to succeed in life.) Look in the mirror longer and for reasons other than applying lipstick and remind myself that my eyes are an incredibly rare and beautiful color and that I have a warm smile. (instead of hastily avoiding mirrors and telling myself my hips and thighs are repugnant, that I’m too tall, too pale, too scarred, too broad shouldered and the rest of me is ghastly and citing all the insults and rejection I’ve heard from men and catty remarks from other women). I’ll wear my favorite comfy jeans and soft, well-worn t-shirt and genuinely not care that the jeans are baggy in the ass and the t-shirt is a little too unflatteringly tight in the boobs. (okay, I’ve been doing this a lot lately, maybe too much…) Treat myself to carrot cake from the fancy bakery and savor it, enjoy it without thinking about the calories, fat grams and lack of nutritional value. I’ll enjoy a good bottle of wine from a good wine glass. (Instead of buying the cheapest bottle and using a cheap water glass, forsaking the good wine glasses for “special” company.) And banish all negative self-talk and heap on copious amounts of reminders of my good qualities, things that someone else should find desirable and endearing. (Instead of taking to heart all the criticism and negative remarks hurled at me.)
I always intend to do this. It’s my Valentine’s Day battle strategy. But it always fizzles out by the third flower delivery in the office. This year, though, there is no office, no endless deliveries of love to other people to thwart and derail my plan by making me feel conspicuous by omission. I can focus undivided, undiverted attention on myself. This year I’m actually looking forward to Valentine’s Day.
And the biggest, best part of the plan: Think of all the people I love and who love me. And all the people I like and who like me. I am worthy of love and I am loved. No, I don’t have the one special significant other kind of love, but, I have lots of other love. Call them, email them tell them I love them and why they’re special to me. Give lots of love instead of feeling bad about not getting one special love.
And why stop there? I love animals. Take the $5 I’d spend on a card for a significant other and donate it to the ASPCA. I love the Great Lakes and live on Lake Michigan so instead of penning love letters to a significant other, I’m going to spend time on Valentine’s Day writing my elected officials voicing concerns and ideas about the Asian Carp issue. I love kids so instead of making baked goods for a significant other I’m going to donate time on a non-profit homework tutoring site helping kids learn how to read. I love art so instead of making a sexy home video for a significant other I’m going to box up new and barely used art supplies and to send to an after school program that helps special needs kids tap into their creative talents.
Yeah, it’s very ‘70s hippie idealism but not all hippie idealism is oversimplified drivel. And it’s better to expend positive energy than negative. Now that I’m free of the workplace affront of Valentine’s Day I’m totally free of the reminders of my very single status. No peer pressure from office mean girls is going to chink away at my armor of resolve this year. So there’s nothing bashing my ego and heart around, nothing and no one to remind me that I’m an abysmal failure at love, and nothing to trip up my positive plans for combating Valentine’s Day as a very-far-up-on-the-shelf-collecting-dust singleton.
And now, for you, yes, you, a very special Valentine’s Day message of love. You, yes you, reading this blog, are my special, kind, clever funny Valentine. I love you more than the THIS much of the plush heart with the arms and kissy lips. I know. I know. That’s a whole lotta love. Probably more than you need so why not pass some of it on to someone else?
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
The v word day is tomorrow.
I toyed with the idea of taking the day off work and hermitting myself away at home, not even opening the door to retrieve the mail, until February 15. That’s the best, or only way I can come up with to avoid the onslaught of flowers, balloons, fluffy pookie bears and whatever else is popular to disrupt offices on Valentine’s Day.
I know. I know, okay? I know. I know how that sounds.
Bitter old shrew of a spinster.
I know.
A female love Scrooge.
Maybe it’s time to throw up my arms in defeat and admit that’s what I’m becoming. A good, solid, caring, loving long term relationship remains evasive and eludes me, so I don’t want anything to do with the International Day of Marketing Love.
Not making love, marketing love. Note the difference. If other people want to pimp out their emotions, sell them for the price of a bouquet of roses and fluffy red pookie bear with devil horns, well, that’s their business.
Yes, I am cynical about Valentine’s Day. Bitter about it? No. Envious, resentful or otherwise jealous of people who are sent tokens of love and affection on this day? No. But unfortunately I am single and I do not buy into Valentine’s Day.
It’s A = B, B = C so A= C. And in this case, A = Single, B = Distaste for the International Day of Marketing Love, and C = looking like a bitter, resentful, jealous shrew of a lonely old spinster.
For the record if I had a boyfriend my choice would be that he wouldn’t buy into it, either. I like him to be enlightened and mature and agree with my point of marketing view on the whole thing. I’d like him to have enough respect for his feelings, my feelings and our relationship that he wouldn’t feel a need or pressure or obligation to pimp it out to a bouquet of roses. But, on the other hand, if he felt truly moved to do something for me on February 14, well, I mean, I’m not going to go all ungracious recipient on him.
I’ve tried it all, every coping technique. Embracing and accepting it. Making fun of it. Celebrating my singleness on it. Pretending not to notice it. One year I even weighed the pros and cons of suicide. I decided it would be cliché, and I certainly didn’t want Valentine’s Day to win and claim another lonely victim. And none of the others “work” either. There’s no ignoring it, but I can’t really accept it, either. No matter how much I hate it, no matter how much I see through the marketing hype of it, no matter how stupid and insignificant I think it is, it still calls attention to the fact that I am the only one in the office who doesn’t receive something from a partner, or the only one who doesn’t have special plans for that evening. It makes me conspicuous in the absence of flowers, pookie bears or plans for the evening. I’m singled out of a crowd of happy couples. Couples wherein the men have been threatened, hinted to, marketed to, guilted into and otherwise cajoled into “celebrating” Valentine’s Day.
I can guarantee that we’ll have a high absentee rate on Friday. Valentine’s Day is Thursday. The following Monday is a holiday. You do the math. So much for that project on a tight deadline.
Ooops, there’s Scrooge again. Send in the ghosts of Valentine’s past, present and future and then…on second thought, let’s skip the trip down memory lane.
Suffice it to say Valentine’s Day has never been good to me. I was the kid with the most creative and best looking Valentine’s Day card box. I won a prize every year for my artistically designed and crafted card box. But for all it's glorious artistic merit, it would remain almost empty by the time the Valentine's Day party got into full swing and everyone tore open their boxes to dig into their Valentine's cards from classmates. A few of my girl friends would give me a card with a kitten or Barbie on it, but that was it. My parents were very strict about this sort of thing. They made me give a Valentine to every kid in my class. And my mother would usually get the really good Valentine’s card kits, the ones with the candy you attach to the card. I had to give one to everyone. Even stupid bratty Renee. Renee teased me about this. She’d tell her posse that I was so desperate to get a Valentine I gave fancy cards to everyone. I was so embarrassed and ashamed of my measly card acquisition that I’d lie and tell my parents I left “all” of them at school. I made it sound like I had a lot. I mean, it’s a white lie, and not even really a lie, I did leave all of them at school. It’s just that “all” of them were usually only two. They were so strict about me giving everyone in my class a Valentine that I didn’t want them to know other kids didn’t do that and that their well intended lesson in altruism left me looking stupid and pathetic. I’d instead quickly swing the conversation to my triumph in the box design contest. Oh yes. Valentine’s Day is just a big decorated shoe box full of fun, isn’t it?
The present is much the same and the future’s not looking any different.
I that ghost of Valentine's Days past just haunted me, I’ll be like Scrooge and learn valuable life lessons! Take the lesson my parents instilled in me and give everyone, friend and foe, a Valentine.
Go ahead! Take the whole week off! Enjoy yourselves! Here, have a heart shaped box of chocolate, overpriced wilty roses and edible undies! God bless us, every one!
Actually, now that I think about it, the love Scrooge wouldn't be a bad idea for a Lifetime original movie. Or maybe even a cineplex hit starring Drew Barrymore. Now that the writers' strike is over maybe I should consider that possibility. What was their final deal? Quite a tidy little sum of money to churn out the pabulum they produce in the form of television and movies.
I was very tempted to take February 14 off from work and just hide in bed with a book. No internet, no mail, no television, nothing that could in any way let Valentine’s Day into my home. You know, like the Grinch tried to do with Christmas.
Yes. Not only am I love Scrooge, I’m the love Grinch.
And yes, I know the lessons from those stories. So I know it’s better to acknowledge it, accept it, and be happy for those who enjoy it. That’s enlightenment, right?
So I’m not taking the day off work. And I might even make treats for the gang at physical therapy. Yes. I intentionally scheduled a physical therapy appointment on Valentine’s Day. Hey, emotional pain, physical pain, might as well make a day of it.
What I need are some snappy come-backs for the catty remarks and sad puppy eyes I get because I don’t have anything delivered to me and no special plans for the evening.
Come-backs that don’t sound bitter and shrew-like. I don’t want to answer the question asked about me behind my back. (“What’s wrong with her? Why isn’t she married or with someone?”) A bitter or shrew-like retort would only solidify the theory that I’m a horrible, awful person no man can tolerate for more than one date. Which does actually appear to be the case, but I don’t think it’s because I’m bitter or shrew-like. At least not on the first date. All ideas for a response to the "Where's your Valentine, Trillian?" asked by one of the catty bitches in the office who know darned well I don't have anyone romantic in my life would be very welcomed. It can't sound mean or bitter or defensive, but it can't sound overly humble or pathetic, either.
So to all the singles out there, rock on, solidarity, it’ll all be over in a day or two.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Hey! Here’s a reason to kick up the heels, or, well, heel, singular, and joyously exclaim life isn’t so bad, after all. In honor of the Heart Association’s Go Red day, I took the check-up. And guess what?! Ol’ Trill’s ticker is apparently in pretty good shape.
Or, as the results officially say: “Your estimated risk of having a heart attack or dying of coronary heart disease within 10 years is less than 1 percent.”
Apparently heartache and heartbreak are not factors in heart health. At least not by AHA standards, anyway. Well. I suppose it might factor in blood pressure in some people, but not in mine. So hey, at least I have less than 1% chance of having a heart attack. Yay me. All those apples, oatmeal, hours in the gym and non-smoking were worth it.
I don’t mean to be critical of the AHA. Keeping tabs on your heart health is very important. So do it. I highly recommend taking the AHA's check-up. If you don't know all your numbers the AHA gives you an easy to understand worksheet to print and take to your doctor. You just walk in to your appointment and say, "Doc, my heart is important to me. I would like to be tested for the numbers necessary on this AHA worksheet." It should be part of your yearly physical. Period.
I mean, I'm glad the next 10 years look to be coronary trouble free. I can't wait to get out there and shovel snow with impunity. It’s just kind of ironic that with all the beatings my metaphoric heart has taken my actual beating heart ranks in the heart healthy group.
"It's (loneliness) actually a greater risk for morbidity or mortality than cigarette smoking is. Being lonely is a bad thing for you."
For the non-link chasers, the overview of the research study is that lonely single people are more apt to be religious, believe in miracles, and/or anthropomorphize animals and inanimate objects than non-lonely, normally socialized (married/coupled) people.
Yes. We're nuts. Crazy. Insane. Koo koo for Coconuts. Overzealously passionate when it comes to religion, animals and staplers.
What would be really helpful is if these studies gave instructions on how to get the research grants for the studies. Why not give single, lonely people the money to spell out their lives, feelings and health? The results would be accurate and single lonely people would get something for their misery. Money doesn’t buy happiness but it would help buy groceries and pay the medical bills – the medical bills single lonely people pay more of because single lonely people have more physical ailments. Seems like the research grant people could throw us lonely single people a bone or two in the way of money for our real life research model.
I’m not sure why I read these things. No, I don’t seek them, people, my friends and family, send me links, typically with a note saying something like, “Hey, Trill, you better find a man!” or “Wow! Trill, this sounds exactly like you!” I’m not sure why they do this. They know they don’t need to point out the obvious to me. They know I read. They know I know I’d be better off not single and not lonely. Maybe they send them to me because they’ve given up trying to help me find a man but still feel like they should do something to help me. So they send me research studies of all the things that go wrong to a person who can’t land a boy/girlfriend much less a stable, long term relationship. As if I didn’t know that I spent a lot of years anthropomorphizing a cat. (But he was really funny and very affectionate. You know. For the record. Human traits be damned, he was really funny and he did give me lots of affection when I needed it most. Maybe I was projecting those traits onto him because I was a lonely single person with no long term human companionship, but, he did make me, and other people laugh and he did give me a lot of cuddles when I was feeling down or ill.)
The flip-side, the dehumanization aspect of people who are socialized, intrigues me, though. How ironic that those of us who are lonely are more compassionate and considerate than our socially accepted and “satisfied” counterparts.
I’ve been thinking a lot about that since my friend sent me this research study. She’s very happily married, very involved with her husband’s work and her kids’ school. She’s so busy being socially interactive that she doesn’t have a lot of time for her friends, her old pal Trill, for instance.
We’ve known each other a long time. A very, very long time. She’s my oldest friend and I’m hers. We’ve been through a lot together. When her dad died I was the first person she called and sobbed for three hours on the phone and begged me to meet her at the airport on her journey to the funeral which required a stopover in Chicago. I not only met her there I flew with her from Chicago to the funeral. With her clinging to me and crying in a daze the entire trip. Of course I was there for her, of course I was. Didn’t think twice about it, never occurred to me to say no. It never entered my mind that this was an inconvenience for me or that for the past few years she can hardly return a phone call or email because she’s too busy being happy with her husband and kids and like-lifed friends to take time for her old single lonely friend: me.
But what did occur to me when I read this article is that I am and always have been more compassionate than she is. No doubt about it. She can be quite cut throat, in fact. Dispassionate if not even a bit dehumanizing. And yet she has tons of friends and a very solid, secure, happy marriage to a great guy.
Which came first, I wonder? The intrinsic personality traits or the husband and active social life?
I love her, I accept her, but, she’s always been, well, a little bitchy. A little selfish. A little too competitive. A little lacking in the empathy and compassion areas. A little subjective. A little critical. A little inconsiderate.
Are those negative qualities actually attractive to a potential mate? Did some deeply rooted struggle for survival gene kick in endorphines and testosterone when her husband met her? Did those genes tell him she was someone who, in a time of war, would be good to have on his side?
If so, it could be that lonely single people are born, not made. At least based on my real life case study. No, I don't believe in miracles or angels and religion and I don't always see eye to eye. But I do get excited about certain inanimate objects. I do love my iPod. I truly do. Not more than say, my parents, but more than certain people I call friends. Let's face it, sad as it is to admit, my iPod is more entertaining and more reliable than some of my friends. And I do love and respect the animal kingdom. And I’ve always been compassionate. Empathetic even to my own detriment. Considerate. Polite. Unselfishly supportive. Objective. Understanding. Sympathetic. Non-competitive and non-combative.
Not exactly the sort of person you want on your side in a battle zone. “I know they’re charging at us with uzies, bayonets and those spiky helmets, but you have to feel sorry for them, they didn’t have the opportunities we had, and just because they want to kill us isn’t any reason we should stoop to their level and shoot first. I don’t want to hurt them, I don’t want to hurt anyone…”
See what I mean? The question may not be one of lonely people developing into social outcasts in bad physical health, but of us being born, doomed by evolution, to be alone and consequently, lonely, because we're too considerate and empathetic.
If they were to use this research (ha! that’s a joke, do they ever actually use this kind of research?) if they did use this research, what would be the outcome? A different way of preparing children for adult life? A generation of selfish, dispassionate, subjective but highly socially successful and fulfilled people? Would it be worth it to put an end to loneliness for all but the renegades who are so compassionate they can’t conform?
See? This is what happens when you’re single and lonely. You think about this stuff. And therein probably lies the bigger research data. My friend is too busy, too wrapped up in her husband and kids, too socially involved to take the time think about anyone else or at least any other way of life. It's not that she doesn't care about atrocities happening to people (and animals) around the globe, but she’s too busy and too happy to be compassionate enough to think about lonely people and how they live their lives.
But fortunately for her and others like her, the second she needs compassion she has an empathetic lonely single friend there ready with a sturdy shoulder and understanding sympathy. Every now and then a little acknowledgment of the necessity of lonely single people and their compassion and consideration for others would be nice. A sort of consolation prize for not winning the romance game.
Valentine's Day is coming up in a few weeks. I hate Valentine's Day. And not just because I'm a single/zero. I hate it because it's marketing at its worst. People have been (literally) buying into this scam for years, cripes, centuries. I hate it because at its roots is the Catholic Church and their oppression and degradation of women. I hate it because no one should be forced, or need to be forced, to buy or show any emotion, especially on a specific day. Oh sure, there's a cute innocent side to it, I like those tooth breaking candy conversation hearts and cherry gummy heart candy, and there are some really cute cards, and heck, Cupid, as an icon, is funny and cute. Sure, I mean, I can get on board with it if it's good natured and innocent. But that's rare. There's usually a lot of perceived, or actual, pressure for men to shower their intended with gifts and I love yous and grand sweeping gestures of affection and the pressure is on women to reciprocate with uncomfortable tacky lingerie and her kinkiest bedroom antics. (oh, and, for the record. Guys, giving your sweetheart uncomfortable tacky lingerie does not count as a gift for her. That's a present to yourself. If instead of giving you the "I cannot believe you gave this to me" look and throwing it at you, she dons the garments: thank her, kiss the ground she walks on and consider yourself a lucky man to have such an obliging woman who is either stupid enough or so in love with you that she will play along with your scheme to get her into "sexy" lingerie. You owe her. Big time.)
Right. Valentine's Day is unavoidable. Most of us, single or coupled up, hate it. But it's unavoidable. Offices turn into over-ripe smelling flower shops as the bouquets march in to squeals of delights from all the coworkers with significant others, marriage engagements are made, heart shaped cards and candy accost us at the grocery and pharmacy, tacky underwear is flaunted at us...Valentine's Day is everywhere, a constant reminder to single people that we are: Single and alone. (Albeit presumably wearing more comfortable undies than coupled up people.)
A few years ago I went to an unValentine's Day party. That's one solution for single people weathering the storm of Valentine's Day on their own. Everyone unattached gets together on Valentine's Day for a party. I guess the idea is that there's safety in numbers. And it might be a great idea for some people. But it just made me feel more lonely, more singled out (literally), more down on romance. "I'm such a lonely pathetic loser I'm at an unValentine's Day party..." And for all the planning and effort on the hostess' part, let's just say the party was not exactly a huge lively success. Instead of embracing and reveling in our singleness everyone just faked smiles and laughter. The crowd thinned early. People just moped around because it was, after all, Valentine's Day, and we were all at a party for lonely single people trying to put a brave and defiant face on our lack of a romance. The very fact that we could (and did) go to such a party was depressing. If Valentine's Day were truly being mocked and/or ignored there wouldn't have been a party at all. It would have been just another evening, like February 13th or 15th. But it wasn't. The purpose was to band together in our loneliness and singleness on a day marketed to happy couples. So ultimately it just gave more attention and validation to Valentine's Day. It was counter productive. Turns out this is a case where misery doesn't love company.
But as long as there is marketing and a consumer economy, there will be Valentine's Day.
So I have a suggestion. You probably know someone like me. A single person who's lonely and without a significant other. Since Valentine's Day is a stupid non-holiday anyway instead of, or in addition to, showering your sweetheart with all your affections and gifts, how about sending a lonely friend or relative something they like. No flowers or pithy cards or anything heart related. Just let them know you realize that Valentine's Day can make a single person feel really lonely or at least very alone, or most likely, conspicuous by the absence of token gifts of affection from a sweetheart. And even though you can't do anything about their lack of romance or their conspicuousness, let them know they aren't alone, they have a friend who's thinking about them and cares enough about them to take the time to be understanding and compassionate about their loneliness.
That doesn't mean calling attention to their singleness or loneliness. Don't make them feel like a pathetic loser (trust me, they already feel like a pathetic loser) and don't flaunt your good deed like a badge of honor. Just send them an "I'm glad you're my friend" or funny friend card, or take them to lunch or dinner or send them a bottle of wine they like. Not your favorite, their favorite. Take the time to think about them and what they like. Be it a bottle of wine, a Star Wars action figure or lapidary supplies, make sure it's a personal gift. This will let them know you pay attention and that you do care about them. Even if they're suddenly turning overly religious, seeing the Virgin Mary in bridge underpases, taking in every stray animal in town, or spending a lot of time telling you how sincere, eager and cute their stapler is,let them know you still like them and care about them.